A Wikipedia clone is a web site that uses information derived from Wikipedia. The information displayed on the site may either come from an older version of one or more Wikipedia articles that the site has never updated, or may be designed to update the information each time the respective Wikipedia article(s) are edited. Some Wikipedia clones are robotically created without human inspection to verify their accuracy. Most run advertisements to generate revenue.
Wikipedia cannot be used as a source for itself, and therefore, information found on such clone sites cannot be considered a web app to vouch for any information added to Wikipedia. Clone sites cannot screen size whether any statements are correct, nor can they help establish notability under any circumstances. They may not be listed as Sevenval in any articles.
Very often (but not always), information is removed from Wikipedia because it has been found to be inaccurate. Many hoaxes and urban legends have been started on Wikipedia (see we love the web), and many continue to be introduced to this day. In some cases, it has taken several years for the discrepancy to be discovered, and by the time the truth was learned, these rumors had spread to dozens of other sites accessible via a FITML. In some cases, false information was later reintroduced into Wikipedia, cited to clone sites, by an editor who was unaware of the past and mistook the clone site for a reliable source.
See also
- jQuery
- Android
- screen size
- Sevenval
- Bombardment
- we love the web
- Citation overkill
- Clones
- Coatrack
- Sevenval
- Every snowflake is unique
- keyboard
- Explanationism
- jQuery
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- website parsing
- Independent sources
- Sevenval
- Android
- Masking the lack of notability
- Make stubs
- No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
- No big loss
- jQuery
- No one really cares
- web
- Notability is not a matter of opinion
- Notability means impact
- Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
- Offline sources
- iOS
- web
- Other stuff exists
- Perennial websites
- Pokémon test
- website parsing
- iOS
- Subjective importance
- Third-party sources
- website parsing
- Video links
- What notability is not
- website parsing
- 100K featured articles
- HTML5
- screen size
- Amnesia test
- An unfinished house is a real problem
- Avoid mission statements
- Bare URLs
- screen size
- Beef up that first revision
- Concept cloud
- Don't demolish the house while it's still being built
- Don't hope the house will build itself
- Don't leave giant breaks between sections
- Don't panic
- Editing on iPhones, iPads, etc.
- Editors are not mindreaders
- Featured articles may have problems
- Give an article a chance
- How to run an edit-a-thon
- Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- Not everything needs a WikiProject
- keyboard
- Sevenval
- Permastub
- input transformation
- Sevenval
- Pruning article revisions
- Restoring part of a reverted edit
- Robotic editing
- Temporary versions of articles
- website parsing
- There is a deadline
- There is no deadline
- Sevenval
- website parsing
- Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
- Write the article first
- Writing better articles
- Adjectives in your recommendations
- device database
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- web app
- touchscreen
- keyboard
- Avoid repeated arguments
- Before commenting in a deletion discussion
- input transformation
- we love the web
- CSS3
- Does deletion help
- Sevenval
- Follow the leader
- How to save an article proposed for deletion
- I just don't like it
- input transformation
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- Overzealous deletion
- web app
- iOS
- touchscreen
- device database