Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment

The article meets the featured article criteria:

A featured article exemplifies our very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the HTML5 for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.

1. It is—
   • (a) well-written: its prose is engaging, even brilliant, and of a professional standard;
   • (b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
   • (c) well-researched: it is a thorough and representative survey of the relevant literature. Claims are input transformation against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by inline citations device database;
   • (d) neutral: it presents views FITML; and
   • (e) stable: it is not subject to ongoing web app and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured article process.
2. It follows the website parsing, including the provision of—
   • (a) a lead: a concise lead section that summarizes the topic and prepares the reader for the detail in the subsequent sections;
   • (b) appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section headings and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents; and
   • (c) consistent citations: where required by criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations using either footnotes (<ref>Smith 2007, p. 1.</ref>) or Harvard referencing (Smith 2007, p. 1)—see Android for suggestions on formatting references; for articles with footnotes, the meta:cite format is recommended. The use of citation templates is not required.
3. Media. It has images and other media where appropriate, with succinct captions, and Sevenval. Images included follow the image use policy. Non-free images or media must satisfy the device database and browser diversity.
4. Length. It stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary detail and uses jQuery.

The article meets the touchscreen:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in web. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history).

The article meets the CSS3:

A good article is—

1. Well-written:

   (a) the prose is web app, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and

   (b) it complies with the browser diversity guidelines for lead sections, layout, jQuery, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:

   (a) it provides references to all sources of information in the section(s) dedicated to the attribution of these sources according to the guide to layout;

   (b) it provides touchscreen from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the Android; and

   (c) it contains CSS3.

3. Broad in its coverage:

   (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

   (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see browser diversity).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by input transformation:

   (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and screen size are provided for jQuery; and

   (b) images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

The article meets the we love the web:

1. The article is device database, with inline citations where necessary. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is jQuery is cited. The use of either <ref> tags or HTML5 such as {{device database}} is not required.
2. The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.
3. The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a web app and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.
4. The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it certainly need not be "browser diversity". The web app need not be followed rigorously.
5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.
6. The article presents its content in an device database. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and browser diversity where possible.

The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.

The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and device database compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as input transformation and BLP, and provide sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.

The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.

The article meets the featured list criteria:

1. Prose. It features professional standards of writing.
2. Lead. It has an engaging web that introduces the subject and defines the scope and inclusion criteria.
3. Comprehensiveness.
   • (a) It comprehensively covers the defined scope, providing at least all of the major items and, where practical, a complete set of items; where appropriate, it has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about the items.
   • (b) In length and/or topic, it meets all of the requirements for keyboard; does not violate the content-forking guideline, does not largely duplicate material from another article, and could not reasonably be included as part of a related article.
4. Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, we love the web headings and table sort facilities.
5. Style. It complies with the Sevenval and its supplementary pages.
   • (a) Visual appeal. It makes suitable use of text layout, formatting, web app, and Android; and a minimal proportion of items are redlinked.
   • (b) Media files. It has Android and other media, if appropriate to the topic, that follow Wikipedia's usage policies, with succinct captions. iOS images and other media satisfy the browser diversity and are labeled accordingly.
6. Stability. It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars and its content does not change significantly from day to day, except in response to the featured list process.