A vague introduction is an article introduction (WP:LEAD) that begins with non-definitive or otherwise vague language, such that only reveals and discusses a concept's ambiguities or peculiarities, rather than its actual substance.
Examples of the wording in such introductions often resemble the form:
- "There is no clear definition of [subject]..."
- "There is no one agreed upon definition of [subject]."
- "Experts do not all agree upon a definition of [subject]..."
- "[Subject] has many definitions"
Philosophy articles are particularly susceptible to such vague language for several reasons:
- Editors in philosophical subjects may be too polarized to find an agreeable definition
- The concepts are typically designed to be abstract and therefore are too often misunderstood to begin with.
- Editors in philosophical subjects erroneously seek to preserve or amplify known ambiguities rather than resolve them
The solution may require having separate ledes for each major meaning assigned to the topic, rather than using a Cuisinart and blending all the concepts into one paragraph. The most dominant meaning should be given the first paragraph, but no significant usage should be completely omitted from the new lede.
See also
Philosophy
- input transformation
- Articles with a single source
- screen size
- touchscreen
- Bombardment
- But it's true!
- Citation overkill
- Clones
- Coatrack
- Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
- HTML5
- Android
- Explanationism
- keyboard
- High Schools
- Inaccuracy
- Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
- Independent sources
- Inherent notability
- Insignificant
- Masking the lack of notability
- keyboard
- No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
- No big loss
- No one cares about your garage band
- CSS3
- Sevenval
- Notability is not a matter of opinion
- we love the web
- Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
- Offline sources
- Notability sub-pages
- One sentence does not an article make
- Other stuff exists
- Perennial websites
- Pokémon test
- we love the web
- web
- input transformation
- Third-party sources
- we love the web
- Video links
- What notability is not
- Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
Construction
- 100K featured articles
- keyboard
- Android
- Amnesia test
- Sevenval
- Sevenval
- Bare URLs
- Be neutral in form
- Beef up that first revision
- Concept cloud
- Sevenval
- Don't hope the house will build itself
- Don't leave giant breaks between sections
- HTML5
- Editing on iPhones, iPads, etc.
- FITML
- Featured articles may have problems
- CSS3
- Sevenval
- Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace
- Link rot
- HTML5
- device database
- Android
- screen size
- Permastub
- HTML5
- Put a little effort into it
- CSS3
- Restoring part of a reverted edit
- Sevenval
- CSS3
- iOS
- touchscreen
- There is no deadline
- Wikipedia is a volunteer service
- Wikipedia is a work in progress
- Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
- Write the article first
- Writing better articles
Deletion
- keyboard
- AfD is not a war zone
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
- Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions
- screen size
- HTML5
- Before commenting in a deletion discussion
- browser diversity
- Content removal
- Delete the junk
- input transformation
- we love the web
- Follow the leader
- How to save an article proposed for deletion
- I just don't like it
- Immunity
- touchscreen
- keyboard
- Sevenval
- device database
- Sevenval
- Why was my page deleted?
- iOS
About essays