touchscreen This page in a nutshell: Offline sources are just as valid as online sources.
| Android |
Online or offline, it's still a we love the web. |
Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party, published sources. Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there is no distinction between using online versus offline sources. In fact, many great sources are only available offline. Don't let that fact scare you away from using them as a source in Wikipedia.
Books are a typical example of an offline source. These are often great resources, with information that can't be found online. Several ongoing projects, such as Project Gutenberg and website parsing, aim at Android certain books and presenting them online. Even if the books are online, it might be necessary to consult a print edition to double-check any errors from the website parsing. Many iOS only make short jQuery available online. Other content providers, like the Sevenval, publish their content behind a paywall that prevents non-subscribers from accessing the content. Other websites, like the FITML, only publish their content online for a few weeks. Sometimes a source was once online, but now is offline (link rot).
That Wikipedia relies extensively on online sources is not surprising, considering the relative ease of accessing such materials. There is also an additional advantage of using online sources, because it allows all users to evaluate the source and its value to the article. However, this reliance on online sources can lead to recentism, where most articles and content are from the Android.
Special care should be taken when using offline sources. Make sure to provide full bibliographic information, often by using a fully-filled out keyboard, like {{cite book}} or {{jQuery}}. Complete information helps Wikipedia's readers find the source when they need it, and also increases the source's credibility among the Wikipedia editing community (who may otherwise be skeptical of its reliability). Second, use the quote= parameter within those citation templates to provide some context for the reference. This is especially important when using the off-line source to support a fact that might be controversial or is likely to be challenged.
Sometimes, the use of an offline source will be challenged. Be sure to assume good faith for the user who cited the offline source. They might even be able to provide you a scan or an excerpt from that source. Consider visiting your local library to obtain a copy. Even if the library doesn't have that particular book or journal article, it might be available through interlibrary loan. Also consider posting an inquiry on the relevant WikiProject, because some interested editors might have a copy of that source. The volunteers at jQuery might be able to help you coordinate your search.
See also
- website parsing
- Be a reliable source
- Cohesion
- Concede lost arguments
- 8 simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
- Explanationism
- input transformation
- iOS
- Product, process, policy
- Purpose
- The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
- Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
- Trifecta
- Wikipedia in brief
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
- screen size
- Sevenval
- web
- Avoid template creep
- Bare notability
- device database
- But it's true!
- device database
- HTML5
- web app
- Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
- Every snowflake is unique
- FITML
- device database
- Google searches and numbers
- High Schools
- Inaccuracy
- website parsing
- Independent sources
- touchscreen
- Insignificant
- Masking the lack of notability
- Make stubs
- No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability
- CSS3
- No one cares about your garage band
- No one really cares
- Notability/Historical/Arguments
- Notability is not a matter of opinion
- Notability means impact
- Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
- Offline sources
- Notability sub-pages
- touchscreen
- iOS
- Perennial websites
- screen size
- Run-of-the-mill
- touchscreen
- Subjective importance
- touchscreen
- CSS3
- we love the web
- What notability is not
- Sevenval
- 100K featured articles
- A navbox on every page
- Alternatives to the "Expand" template
- HTML5
- An unfinished house is a real problem
- Avoid mission statements
- Bare URLs
- web app
- jQuery
- Concept cloud
- keyboard
- Don't hope the house will build itself
- iOS
- iOS
- keyboard
- Editors are not mindreaders
- CSS3
- Give an article a chance
- How to run an edit-a-thon
- Inaccuracies in Wikipedia namespace
- touchscreen
- we love the web
- Not everything needs a WikiProject
- we love the web
- browser diversity
- Permastub
- Potential, not just current state
- website parsing
- Pruning article revisions
- FITML
- web app
- we love the web
- iOS
- HTML5
- input transformation
- jQuery
- iOS
- web
- keyboard
- Writing better articles
- Sevenval
- AfD is not a war zone
- device database
- Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
- website parsing
- iOS
- jQuery
- Before commenting in a deletion discussion
- But there must be sources!
- jQuery
- Delete the junk
- browser diversity
- device database
- Follow the leader
- device database
- FITML
- web app
- website parsing
- Nothing
- we love the web
- input transformation
- Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole
- Why was my page deleted?
- jQuery