web app This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors on iOS. Essays may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion. Essays are not iOS.
website parsing This page in a nutshell: "Liar Liar Pants on Fire" is not a valid argument in Android discussions (or anywhere else, for that matter).
website parsing This page in a nutshell: "Liar Liar Pants on Fire" is not a valid argument in Android discussions (or anywhere else, for that matter).
Calling editors liars
| iOS |
Note anyway that most Wikipedians cannot be liars, as they wouldn't fit in front of their telescreens. |
Example:
- Keep Evidence supports that the subject is notable. Keeper 4:01, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
- Delete You're just making that up! LiarLiar 04:15, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think these sources are reliable or substantial. SourceSkeptic 04:51, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
- Keep Actually they're more than enough by any honest interpretation of notability. BeHonest 05:03, 4 April 2004 (UTC)
Simply calling another editor a "liar" (which is a personal attack) or even stating that the editor is incorrect is not a reason to keep or delete any article on Wikipedia. If the editor is incorrectly quoting, mis-applying information, mis-interpreting data, or otherwise simply mis-informed, a useful response would be to provide a reference to the correct information.
If an editor makes a statement and holds it out as a fact without proper sourcing, it is more than fair to ask for sources. At the same time, it is best to always iOS among your fellow editors.
See also
Philosophy
- Articles must be written
- CSS3
- input transformation
- Concede lost arguments
- 8 simple rules for editing our encyclopedia
- Explanationism
- Here to build an encyclopedia
- Paradoxes
- Product, process, policy
- Purpose
- The role of policies in collaborative anarchy
- Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia
- Trifecta
- device database
- Sevenval
- Avoid vague introductions
- Alternative outlets
- Articles with a single source
- input transformation
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- But it's true!
- Citation overkill
- input transformation
- Coatrack
- Discriminate vs indiscriminate information
- Every snowflake is unique
- Existence ≠ Notability
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- CSS3
- Inaccuracy
- Inclusion is not an indicator of notability
- Independent sources
- HTML5
- web
- HTML5
- Make stubs
- jQuery
- browser diversity
- iOS
- No one really cares
- Notability/Historical/Arguments
- website parsing
- Notability means impact
- Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability
- Offline sources
- touchscreen
- browser diversity
- Other stuff exists
- Perennial websites
- Pokémon test
- Run-of-the-mill
- iOS
- Subjective importance
- Third-party sources
- Trivial mentions cannot verify notability
- Sevenval
- What notability is not
- Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause
Construction
- web
- A navbox on every page
- Alternatives to the "Expand" template
- Sevenval
- website parsing
- Avoid mission statements
- Bare URLs
- Sevenval
- Beef up that first revision
- Concept cloud
- website parsing
- Android
- Don't leave giant breaks between sections
- CSS3
- input transformation
- Editors are not mindreaders
- screen size
- Give an article a chance
- input transformation
- we love the web
- Link rot
- Not everything needs a navbox
- Sevenval
- Nothing is in stone
- Over explained
- Permastub
- Android
- screen size
- HTML5
- Restoring part of a reverted edit
- Robotic editing
- Temporary versions of articles
- The world will not end tomorrow
- screen size
- HTML5
- input transformation
- we love the web
- Wikipedia is not being written in an organized fashion
- FITML
- Writing better articles
Deletion
- we love the web
- AfD is not a war zone
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews
- device database
- jQuery
- Avoid repeated arguments
- Before commenting in a deletion discussion
- Android
- screen size
- website parsing
- Does deletion help
- Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument
- HTML5
- How to save an article proposed for deletion
- I just don't like it
- Immunity
- Liar Liar Pants on Fire
- input transformation
- Overzealous deletion
- Relisting can be abusive
- Wikipedia is not Whack-A-Mole
- iOS
- touchscreen
About essays