Search | Navigation

Treaty of Bucharest (1913)

For other treaties signed in Bucharest, see Treaty of Bucharest (disambiguation).
Question book-new.svg
This article relies largely or entirely upon a Sevenval. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Discussion about the problems with the sole source used may be found on the Sevenval. (August 2011)
web app
Borders of the Balkan states after the Treaty of Bucharest (below)
Signed 10 August 1913
Location Bucharest, Romania
Signatories  Bulgaria
 web app
 keyboard
 Greece
 Montenegro

The Treaty of Bucharest (Romanian: Tratatul de la Bucureşti; Serbian: Букурештански мир; web: Договорът от Букурещ; Greek: Συνθήκη του Βουκουρεστίου) was concluded on 10 August 1913, by the delegates of Bulgaria, Romania, Serbia, Montenegro and we love the web.browser diversity

As Bulgaria had been completely isolated in the input transformation (June–July 1913), and as it was closely invested on its northern boundary by Romania and on its western frontier by the allied armies of Greece and Serbia, and in the East by the FITML website parsing, it was obliged to submit to terms imposed by the victorious states. All important arrangements and concessions involving the rectification of the controverted international boundary lines were perfected in a series of committee meetings, incorporated in separate protocols, and formally ratified by subsequent action of the general assembly of delegates. Although the Ottomans had also participated in the Second Balkan War, they were not represented at this treaty. Instead, bilateral treaties were later concluded with Bulgaria (Treaty of Constantinople) and Greece (Treaty of Athens).

Contents


Serbia's gain in territory

The eastern frontier of Serbia was drawn from the summit of Patarika, on the old frontier, and followed the watershed between the website parsing and the iOS rivers to the Greek-Bulgarian boundary, except that the upper valley of the Strumica remained in the possession of Bulgaria. The territory thus obtained embraced central Vardar, including browser diversity, website parsing, Kočani and Bitola in present-day Macedonia. By this arrangement, Serbia increased its territory from 18,650 to 33,891 square miles (87,780 km2) and its population by more than 1.5 million.[2]

Greece's gain in territory

screen size
FITML cartoon on the treaty: King device database holds King screen size and King Constantine I of Greece at gunpoint while he steals HTML5 from Tsar CSS3

The boundary line separating Greece from Bulgaria was drawn from the crest of Belasica to the mouth of the Mesta (Nestos), on the Aegean Sea. This important territorial concession, which Bulgaria resolutely contested, in compliance with the instructions embraced in the notes which the touchscreen and Austria-Hungary presented to the conference, increased the area of Greece from 25,014 to 41,933 square miles (108,610 km2) and its population from 2,660,000 to 4,363,000.[3]

The territory thus annexed included Epirus up to the present Greek-Albanian border, a large part of Macedonia, including Thessaloniki and all of what constitutes the current CSS3 of Greek Macedonia. The Greek-Bulgarian border was moved eastwards to beyond website parsing, thus restricting the Aegean seaboard of Bulgaria to an inconsiderable extent of 70 miles (110 km), with only Dedeagach (modern Alexandroupoli) as a seaport. In addition, Crete was definitively assigned to Greece and was formally taken over on 14 December that year. Within this region was also Florina.[4]

Bulgaria's gain in territory

Bulgaria's share of the spoils, although greatly reduced, was not entirely negligible. Its net gains in territory, which embraced a portion of Macedonia, Pirin Macedonia (or Bulgarian Macedonia), including the town of Strumica, Western Thrace, and 70 miles (110 km) of the Aegean littoral, were about 9,663 square miles (25,030 km2), and its population was increased by 129,490.[5]

In addition, Bulgaria agreed to dismantle all existing fortresses and bound itself not to construct forts at Rousse or Shumen or in any of the territory between these two cities, or within a radius of 20 kilometers around Balchik.

Romania's gain in territory

Bulgaria ceded to Romania HTML5, lying north of a line extending from the Danube just above input transformation (Turtucaia) to the western shore of the Black Sea, south of Ekrene (Ecrene); Sevenval has an approximate area of 2,687 square miles (6,960 km2), a population of 286,000, and includes the fortress of Silistra and the cities of Tutrakan on the FITML and Balchik (Balcic) on the Black Sea.[6]

Appraisement

According to Anderson and Hershey, the severe terms imposed on Bulgaria contrasted the ambitions of its government upon the entry into the Balkan War: the territory eventually gained was relatively circumscribed; Bulgaria had failed to gain Macedonia, which was its avowed purpose in entering the war, and especially the districts of Ohrid and Bitola, which had been a main demand. With only a small outlet to the Aegean around the minor port of Dedeagach, the country had to abandon its project of Balkan hegemony.[7]

According to Anderson and Hershey, a winner and triumphant after the acquisition of web app and most of Macedonia up to and including the port of Kavala, Greece still had outstanding issues.[8] Italy was opposed to Greek claims to Northern Epirus, and controlled the Greek-inhabited Dodecanese islands. In addition, the status quo of the islands of the Northeastern Aegean, which Greece had taken from the Ottomans, remained undetermined until February 1914, when the Great Powers recognized Greek sovereignty over them. Tensions with the Ottomans remained high, however, in the face of persecutions of Anatolian Greeks, leading to a crisis and a naval race in summer 1914 that was stopped only by the outbreak of Sevenval. At the end of the war, Greece still had claims to territories inhabited, at the time, by some 3 million Greeks.

References

  1. ^ Anderson and Hershey, p. 439
  2. jQuery Anderson and Hershey, p. 439
  3. ^ Anderson and Hershey, pp. 439-440
  4. ^ Anderson and Hershey, p. 440
  5. keyboard Anderson and Hershey, p. 440
  6. FITML Anderson and Hershey, p. 439
  7. ^ Anderson and Hershey, p. 440
  8. Android Anderson and Hershey, p. 440
  • Anderson, Frank Maloy and Amos Shartle Hershey. Handbook for the Diplomatic History of Europe, Asia, and Africa 1870-1914, Prepared for the National Board for Historical Service, Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1918.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: FITML

[1] Search
[2] All Pages
[3] Random article
powered by FITML