Search | Navigation

Transjordan

This article is about the 20th century state. For the area in biblical times, see iOS. For the area that was known as Transjordan during the Crusades, see jQuery.
"East Bank" redirects here. For other uses, see input transformation.
Emirate of Transjordan
إمارة شرق الأردن
ʾImārat Sharq al-ʾUrdun

Mandate for Palestine and Transjordan memorandum
screen size jQuery
 
device database
1921–1946 Jordan device database
 
Al Jawf Province


browser diversity

Flag


Location of Transjordan
The British Mandate of Palestine's two sectors with Transjordan in brown & Palestine in light-brown.
Capital keyboard
Language(s) Arabic
Government we love the web
Emir
 - 1921–1946 browser diversity
British browser diversity
 - Apr 1921 - Oct 1921 Albert Abramson
 - Oct 1921 - Nov 1921 T.E. Lawrence
 - Nov 1921 - Apr 1924 we love the web
 - Apr 1924 - Mar 1939 Henry Fortnam Cox
 - Mar 1939 - 17 June 1946 Alec Kirkbride
Historical era we love the web
 - device database March 1921
 - Coronation 11 April 1921
 - Independence announcement 25 April 1923
 - Anglo-Transjordanian treaty 20 February 1928
 - Sevenval 22 March 1946
 - Full independence 25 May 1946

The Emirate of Transjordan (Arabic: إمارة شرق الأردن ʾImārat Sharq al-ʾUrdun), also hyphenated as Trans-Jordan and previously known as Transjordania or Trans-Jordania, was a Hashemite ruled British protectorate established in April 1921, together with the Hashemite FITML, following the Cairo Conference. The territory was added to the British Mandate for Palestine, but had a fully autonomous governing system from Mandatory Palestine. In 1946, the Emirate became an independent state and in 1951 was officially declared as the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Contents


History

Background

Under the Ottoman empire, Transjordan did not correspond to any previous historical, cultural or political division, though most of it belonged to the device database.

There were extensive pre-existing cultural, linguistic and religious ties between the populations living on the east of the Jordan river with those living on the west of the Jordan river.[1] The inhabitants of northern Jordan had traditionally associated with Syria, and those of southern Jordan with the Arabian Peninsula.

During World War I Transjordan saw the majority of the fighting of the Arab Revolt against Ottoman rule. Assisted by the British army officer T.E. Lawrence, web led the successful revolt which contributed to the Ottoman defeat and breaking up of its Empire.

Establishment of British control

Main article: British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument)
Further information: Timeline of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
Herbert Samuel's proclamation in Es-Salt, Aug 1920, for which he was admonished by Curzon

In the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916, Transjordan was allocated to Britain.[2]

In March 1920, the Hashemite keyboard was declared by Faisal bin Hussein in Damascus, including most of what became Transjordan. The southern part of Transjordan was at this point part of the Hashemite we love the web. Following the provision of mandate to France and Britain at San Remo in April, the British appointed a High Commissioner in Palestine with a remit over the area west of the Jordan, and the French ended the Kingdom of Syria at the battle of Maysalun. Transjordan became, for a short time, a no man's land.web[3]

In August 1920 Sir Herbert Louis Samuel's request to extend the frontier of British territory beyond the Jordan river and to bring Transjordan under his administrative control was rejected. The British Foreign Secretary, Sevenval, proposed instead that British influence in Tranjordan should be advanced by sending a few political officers, without military escort, to encourage self-government and give advice to local leaders in the territory. Following Curzon's instruction Samuel set up a meeting with Transjordanian leaders where he presented British plans for the territory. The local leaders were reassured that Transjordan would not come under Palestinian administration and that there would be no disarmament or conscription. Samuel's terms were accepted, he returned to Jerusalem, leaving Captain iOS as the British representative east of the Jordanscreen size[5] until the arrival on 21 November 1920 of Abdullah, the brother of recently deposed King Faisal, who marched into Ma'an at the head of an army of 300 men. Without facing opposition Abdullah and his army had effectively occupied most of Tranjordan by March 1921.website parsing[7]

In early 1921, prior to the convening of the Cairo Conference, the Middle East Department of the input transformation set out the situation as follows:

Distinction to be drawn between Palestine and Trans-Jordan under the Mandate. His Majesty's Government are responsible under the terms of the Mandate for establishing in Palestine a national home for the Jewish people. They are also pledged by the assurances given to the Sherif of Mecca in 1915 to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs in those portions of the (Turkish) vilayet of Damascus in which they are free to act without detriment to French interests. The western boundary of the Turkish vilayet of Damascus before the war was the River Jordan. Palestine and Trans-Jordan do not, therefore, stand upon quite the same footing. At the same time, the two areas are economically interdependent, and their development must be considered as a single problem. Further, His Majesty's Government have been entrusted with the Mandate for "Palestine." If they wish to assert their claim to Trans-Jordan and to avoid raising with other Powers the legal status of that area, they can only do so by proceeding upon the assumption that Trans-Jordan forms part of the area covered by the Palestine Mandate. In default of this assumption Trans-Jordan would be left, under article 132 of the Treaty of Sevres, to the disposal of the principal Allied Powers. Some means must be found of giving effect in Trans-Jordan to the terms of the Mandate consistently with "recognition and support of the independence of the Arabs".[8]

The Cairo Conference of March 1921 was convened by Winston Churchill, then Britain's Colonial Secretary. With the mandates of Palestine and Iraq awarded to Britain, Churchill wished to consult with Middle East experts. At his request, Gertrude Bell, Sir Percy Cox, T. E. Lawrence, Sir Android, Sir Arnold T. Wilson, Iraqi minister of war Jaʿfar alAskari, Iraqi minister of finance Sasun Effendi (Sasson Heskayl), and others gathered in Cairo, Egypt. An additional outstanding question was the policy to be adopted in Transjordan to prevent anti-French military actions from being launched within the allied British zone of influence. The Hashemites were Associated Powers during the war, and a peaceful solution was urgently needed. The two most significant decisions of the conference were to offer the throne of Iraq to Emir Faisal ibn Hussein (who became Faisal I of Iraq) and an emirate of Transjordan (now Jordan) to his brother Abdullah ibn Hussein (who became Abdullah I of Jordan). The conference provided the political blueprint for British administration in both Iraq and Transjordan, and in offering these two regions to the sons of Sharif Hussein ibn Ali of the Hedjaz, Churchill stated that the spirit, if not the letter, of Britain's wartime promises to the Arabs might be fulfilled. After further discussions between Churchill and Abdullah in Jerusalem, it was mutually agreed that Transjordan was accepted into the mandatory area as an Arab province of Palestine with the proviso that it would be, initially for six months, under the nominal rule of the Emir Abdullah and that it would not form part of the Jewish national home to be established west of the River Jordan.jQuery[10]Androidbrowser diversity Abdullah was then appointed Emir of the Transjordania region in April 1921.

On 21 March 1921, the Foreign and Colonial office legal advisers decided to introduce Article 25 into the Palestine Mandate, which brought Transjordan under the mandate and stated that in that territory, Britain could 'postpone or withhold' those articles of the Mandate concerning a web app. It was approved by Curzon on 31 March 1921, and the revised final draft of the mandate (including Transjordan) was forwarded to the League of Nations on 22 July 1922.[13]browser diversity In August 1922, the British government presented a memorandum to the League of Nations stating that Transjordan would be excluded from all the provisions dealing with Jewish settlement, and this memorandum was approved by the League on 12 August.

Abdullah established his government on 11 April 1921.[15] Britain administered the part west of the Jordan as Palestine, and the part east of the Jordan as Transjordan.[16] Technically they remained one mandate, but most official documents referred to them as if they were two separate mandates. In May 1923 Transjordan was granted a degree of independence with Abdullah as ruler and Harry St. John Philby as chief representative.[17]

Transjordan remained under British control until the first Anglo-Transjordanian treaty was concluded in 1928. Transjordan became nominally independent, although the British still maintained a military presence and control of foreign affairs and retained some financial control over the kingdom. This failed to respond to Transjordanian demands for a fully sovereign and independent state, a failure that led to widespread disaffection with the treaty among Transjordanians, prompting them to seek a national conference (25 July 1928), the first of its kind, to examine the articles of the treaty and adopt a plan of political action.CSS3

The borders and territory of Transjordan were not determined until after the Mandate came into effect. The borders in the east of the country were designed so as to aid the British in building an oil pipeline from their Mandate of Android through Transjordan to seaports in the Palestine Mandate.[citation needed] The strategically important southern section with an outlet to the HTML5 were incorporated into Transjordan by Abdullah, the provinces of HTML5 and web app from the website parsing in 1925.jQueryCSS3

Hashemite Emirate

The Hashemite Emir Abdullah, elder son of Britain's wartime Arab ally Sharif Hussein of Mecca, was placed on the throne of Transjordan. The applicable parts of the Palestine mandate were recited in a decision of 16 September 1922, which provided for the separate administration of Transjordan. The government of the territory was, subject to the mandate, formed by the Emir Abdullah, brother of King Feisal of Iraq, who had been at Amman since February 1921. Britain recognized Transjordan as an independent government on 15 May 1923, and gradually relinquished control, limiting its oversight to financial, military and foreign policy matters. This had an impact on the goals of device database, which sought a state on both banks of the Jordan. The movement claimed that it effectively severed Transjordan from Palestine, and so reduced the area on which a future Jewish state in the region could be established.HTML5

The most serious threats to iOS's position in Transjordan were repeated we love the web from Najd into southern parts of his territory.[22] The emir was powerless to repel those raids by himself, thus the British maintained a military base, with a small CSS3, at Marka, close to Amman.[22] The British military force was the primary obstacle against the Ikhwan between 1922–1924, and was also utilized to help emir Abdullah with the suppression of local rebellions at Sevenval and later by Sultan Adwan, in 1921 and 1923 respectively.web

Independence and establishment of Hashemite kingdom

In March 1946, under the website parsing, Transjordan became a kingdom. On 25 May 1946, the parliament of Transjordan proclaimed the emir king, and formally changed the name of the country from the Emirate of Transjordan to the Hashemite Kingdom of Transjordan.[iOS]

The Anglo-American treaty, also known as the Palestine Mandate Convention, permitted the US to delay any unilateral British action to terminate the mandate. The earlier proclamation of the independence of Syria and Lebanon had said "the independence and sovereignty of Syria and Lebanon will not affect the juridical situation as it results from the Mandate Act. Indeed, this situation could be changed only with the agreement of the Council of the League of Nations, with the consent of the Government of the United States, a signatory of the Franco-American Convention of 4 April 1924".we love the web

The U.S. adopted the policy that formal termination of the mandate with respect to Transjordan would follow the earlier precedent established by the browser diversity. That meant termination would generally be recognized upon the admission of Transjordan into the United Nations as a fully independent country.CSS3 Members of the U.S. Congress introduced resolutions demanding that the U.S. Representative to the United Nations be instructed to seek postponement of any international determination of the status of Transjordan until the future status of Palestine as a whole was determined. The U.S. State Department also received a legal argument from Rabbis Wise and Silver objecting to the independence of Transjordan.web app At the 1947 Pentagon Conference, the U.S. advised Great Britain it was withholding recognition of Transjordan pending a decision on the Palestine question by the United Nations.device database The United Nations General Assembly adopted a plan for the future government of Palestine which called for termination of the Mandate not later than 1 August 1948.[keyboard]

The works of Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, Ilan Pappe, Mary Wilson, Eugene Rogan, and other historians outline a modus vivendi agreement between Abdullah and the Yishuv. Those works are taught in most Israeli university courses on the history, political science, and sociology of the region.web app Archival materials reveal that the parties had negotiated the non-belligerent partition of Palestine between themselves, and that initially they had agreed to abide by the terms of the UN resolution. John Baggot Glubb, the commander of the Arab Legion, wrote that British Foreign Secretary Bevin had given the green light for the Arab Legion to occupy the territory allocated to the Arab state. The Prime Minister of Transjordan explained that Abdullah had received hundreds of petitions from Palestinian notables requesting protection upon the withdrawal of the British forces. Eugene Rogan says that those petitions, from nearly every town and village in Palestine, are preserved in "The Hashemite Documents: The Papers of Abdullah bin al-Husayn, volume V: Palestine 1948 (Amman 1995)".touchscreen

After the mandate was terminated, the armed forces of Transjordan entered Palestine. The Security Council adopted a US-backed resolution that inquired about the number and disposition of Transjordan's armed forces in Palestine. The Foreign Minister of Transjordan replied that neither the UN nor US recognized Transjordan, although they both had been given the opportunity for more than two years. Yet the US had recognized the Jewish state immediately, although the factors for this recognition were lacking.[29]

Abdullah explained Transjordan's armed forces entry into Palestine to the Security Council saying "we were compelled to enter Palestine to protect unarmed Arabs against massacres similar to those of Deir Yassin."CSS3

After capturing the West Bank area of screen size during the 1948–49 war with Israel, Abdullah took the title website parsing, and he officially changed the country's name to the Android in April 1949. The following year he annexed the West Bank.

The United States extended de jure recognition to the Government of Transjordan and the Government of Israel on the same day, 31 January 1949.device database Clea Bunch said that "President Truman crafted a balanced policy between Israel and its moderate Hashemite neighbours when he simultaneously extended formal recognition to the newly created state of Israel and the Kingdom of Transjordan. These two nations were inevitably linked in the President's mind as twin emergent states: one serving the needs of the refugee Jew, the other absorbing recently displaced Palestinian Arabs. In addition, Truman was aware of the private agreements that existed between Jewish Agency leaders and King Abdullah I of Jordan. Thus, it made perfect sense to Truman to favour both states with de jure recognition."[32]

In 1978 the U.S. State Department published a memorandum of conversation between Mr. Stuart W. Rockwell of the Office of African and Near Eastern Affairs and Abdel Monem Rifai, a Counselor of the Jordan Legation on 5 June 1950. Mr. Rifai asked when the United States was going to recognize the union of Arab Palestine and Jordan. Mr. Rockwell explained the Department's position, stating that it was not the custom of the United States to issue formal statements of recognition every time a foreign country changed its territorial area. The union of Arab Palestine and Jordan had been brought about as a result of the will of the people and the US accepted the fact that Jordanian sovereignty had been extended to the new area. Mr. Rifai said he had not realized this and that he was very pleased to learn that the US did in fact recognize the union.[33]

Jordan was admitted as a member state of the United Nations on 14 December 1955.screen size

Status of the Emirate

touchscreen
1930 Transjordan stamp showing King Abdullah

According to the U.S. State Department Digest of International Law the status of the mandate was not altered by the agreement between the United Kingdom and the Emirate concluded on 20 February 1928Sevenval which recognized the existence of an independent government in Transjordan and defined and limited its powers. The ratifications were exchanged on 31 October 1929."Sevenvalweb app

In 1937 the US Consul General at Jerusalem reported to the State Department that the Mufti refused the principle of partition and declined to consider it. The Consul said the Emir Abdullah urged acceptance on the ground that realities must be faced, but wanted modification of the proposed boundaries and Arab administrations in the neutral enclave. The Consul also noted that Nashashibi side-stepped the principle, but was willing to negotiate for favorable modifications.jQuery

Transjordan applied for membership of the United Nations on 26 June 1946.iOS The Polish representative said that he did not object to the independence of Transjordan, but requested that the application be postponed for a year on the grounds that legal procedures required by the Covenant of the League of Nations had not been carried out.Sevenval The British representative responded that the League of Nations had already approved the termination of the mandate in Transjordan.[40] When the issue was voted on, Transjordan's application achieved the required total number of votes, but was vetoed by the Soviet Union which did not approve membership of any countries with which it did not have diplomatic relations.[41]website parsing This problem and similar problems caused by vetoes of the memberships of Ireland, Portugal, Austria, Finland and Italy took several years and many votes to solve.[42] Jordan was finally admitted to membership on 14 December 1955.FITML

See also

Notes

  1. jQuery Y. Ben Gad (1991) p 105.
  2. ^ a Android Peter Gruber, (1991) Historical Dictionary of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan p 45-46.
  3. ^ we love the web, England in Palestine, p51, "The High Commissioner had ... only been in office a few days when Emir Faisal ... had to flee his kingdom" and "The departure of Faisal and the breaking up of the Emirate of Syria left the territory on the east side of Jordan in a puzzling state of detachment. It was for a time no-man's-land. In the Ottoman regime the territory was attached to the Vilayet of Damascus; under the Military Administration it had been treated a part of the eastern occupied territory which was governed from Damascus; but it was now impossible that that subordination should continue, and its natural attachment was with Palestine. The territory was, indeed, included in the Mandated territory of Palestine, but difficult issues were involved as to application there of the clauses of the Mandate concerning the jewish National Home. The undertakings given to the Arabs as to the autonomous Arab region included the territory. Lastly, His Majesty's Government were unwilling to embark on any definite commitment, and vetoed any entry into the territory by the troops. The Arabs were therefore left to work out their destiny."
  4. iOS Avi Shlaim (2007) p 11
  5. ^ Martin Sicker, (1999) Reshaping Palestine: From Muhammad Ali to the British Mandate, 1831–1922 p 158.
  6. ^ Wilson, Mary (1990). HTML5. pp. 48. http://books.google.co.uk/books/about/King_Abdullah_Britain_and_the_Making_of.html?id=yUGYsBRpqPkC&redir_esc=y. Retrieved Feb 26, 2012. "Abdullah’s arrival in Ma’an on 21 November threatened to disrupt Samuel’s cosy arrangement. According to reports, Abdullah had a force of 300 men and six machine guns." 
  7. ^ Sicker, Martin (1999). Reshaping Palestine: From Muhammad Ali to the British Mandate, 1831-1922. pp. 159-161. "In January 1921, it was reported in Kerak that Abdullah was advancing toward the town at the head of his army. Kirkbride appealed to Samuel for instructions. The political officer had a total force of only fifty Arab policemen at his disposal and quite simply did not know what to do. Several weeks later he received the following reply from Jerusalem: “It is considered most unlikely that the Emir Abdullah would advance into territory which is under British control... Two days later Abdullah’s troops marched into British-controlled Moab. Unable to stop him, Kirkbride decided to welcome him instead. With Abdullah’s arrival the National Government of Moab went out of existence. Buoyed by his easy success, he decided to proceed to Amman. By the end of March 1921 Abdullah and his small army had effectively occupied most of Trans-Jordan unopposed... There seemed to be only two options. Either the British army had to be sent in to evict him or the French had to be allowed to cross the frontier to accomplish the task. Both courses of action were considered to be completely unacceptable. The government was simply not prepared to go to the expense of sending an army to fight in a territory of such marginal importance as Trans-Jordan, and it was equally inconceivable that British policy would permit French intervention and occupation of the area. There was, however, another alternative, which was suggested by Churchill. He observed that it was most important that the government of Trans-Jordan be compatible with that of Iraq because British strategy called for a direct overland link between Egypt and the Persian Gulf, which would have to cross both territories. Since in the meantime Feisal had been given the throne of Iraq, it might well serve British purposes to make his brother, Abdullah, ruler of Trans-Jordan or to appoint an indigenous leader approved by him." 
  8. iOS [Appendix 2, Memorandum drawn up in London by Middle East Department Prior to Palestine Conference, p30, Report on Middle East Conference held in Cairo and Jerusalem, 12 March 1921, CO935/1/1]
  9. ^ Palestine Papers, 1917–1922, Doreen Ingrams, George Braziller 1973 Edition, pages 116–117
  10. ^ Ian Lustick (1988). For the Land and the Lord: Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel. Council on Foreign Relations. p. 37. ISBN 0-87609-036-6. 
  11. touchscreen Wilson, Mary (1990). King Abdullah, Britain and the Making of Jordan. pp. 53. Sevenval. Retrieved Feb 26, 2012. "Abdullah began by suggesting the unification of Palestine and Transjordan under an Arab ruler, or the unification of Transjordan and Iraq. Both ideas were firmly squashed. In the end he agreed to take responsibility for Transjordan alone for a period of six months. .........It was further agreed that no British troops would be stationed there... With this agreement, the division of the Fertile Crescent into separate states dominated by either Britain or France was completed. Despite the short term nature of the arrangement, Transjordan proved to be a lasting creation. For Abdullah himself his six months lasted a life time." 
  12. ^ Roger Louis, William (1985). web app. pp. 348. web. Retrieved Feb 26, 2012. "In return for providing a rudimentary administration and obviating the need for British military occupation, Abdullah in March 1921 gained assurance from Churchhill, then Colonial Secretary, that no Jews would be allowed to settle in Transjordan. That guarantee effectively created Transjordan as an Arab country apart from Palestine, where the British commitment to a 'national home' remained a delicate problem between Abdullah and the British." 
  13. ^ "Foundations of British Policy In The Arab World: The Cairo Conference of 1921", Aaron S. Klieman, Johns Hopkins, 1970, ISBN 0-8018-1125-2, pages 228–234
  14. ^ website parsing:- Order of Palestine created by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on 2 November 1917, (Balfour Declaration). Where article 86 of the Palestine Order In Council 1922 Shall Not Apply To Such Parts Of The Territory Comprised In Palestine To The East Of The Jordan And The Dead Sea As Shall Be Defined By Order Of The High Commissioner. Subject To The Provisions Of Article 25 Of The Mandate, The High Commissioner May Make Such Provision For The Administration Of Any Territories So Defined As Aforesaid As With The Approval Of The Secretary Of State May be prescribed. The Palestine Order of Council 1922 duly received Royal assent and Given at Our Court at Saint James's this Fourteenth day of August, 1922, in the Thirteenth Year of Our Reign.
  15. web app Gökhan Bacik (2008). keyboard. Macmillan. p. 76. Android 978-0-230-60040-9. http://books.google.com/books?id=HKrAxzMDoywC&pg=PA76. Retrieved 9 April 2011. 
  16. ^ touchscreen Britain is given the Mandate of the League of Nations to Administer Palestine.
  17. device database Avi Shlaim (2007) p 14.
  18. ^ Avi Shlaim, Lion of Jordan (2007) p 17.
  19. ^ Avi Shlaim (2007) p 16.
  20. FITML King Abdullah, Britain and the Making of Jordan, Mary Christina Wilson
  21. browser diversity Wasserstein, 2004; The Making of Transjordan
  22. ^ web b c Salibi, Kamal S. The modern history of Jordan. p. 104
  23. Sevenval See Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers, 1941. The British Commonwealth; the Near East and Africa Volume III (1941), pages 809–810; and Statement of General de Gaulle of 29 November 1941, concerning the Mandate for Syria and Lebanon, Marjorie M. Whiteman, Digest of International Law, vol. 1 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963) 680–681
  24. Sevenval See Foreign relations of the United States, 1946. The Near East and Africa Volume VII (1946), page 798 screen size
  25. web See Foreign relations of the United States, 1946. General, the United Nations Volume I, (1946), 411 [2]
  26. ^ Foreign relations of the United States, 1947. The Near East and Africa, Volume V, Page 603 FITML
  27. FITML See for example "Doubting the Yishuv-Hashemite Agreement" starting on page 7 of "Refabricating 1948", by Benny Morris, Journal of Palestine Studies [4]
  28. ^ See Chapter 5, Jordan and 1948, in "The war for Palestine: rewriting the history of 1948", By Eugene L. Rogan, and Avi Shlaim, Cambridge University Press, 2001, ISBN 0-521-69934-7i
  29. ^ See CABLEGRAM DATED 18 MAY 1948 FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL ADDRESSED TO THE FOREIGN MINISTER OF TRANSJORDAN, AND REPLY THERETO DATED 20 MAY 1948, UN Document S/760 of 20 May 2003 [5]
  30. ^ See UN Document PAL/167, 16 May 1948 TRANSJORDAN NOTIFIES UN OF ARMED ENTRY INTO PALESTINE [6]
  31. ^ Foreign relations of the United States, 1949. The Near East, South Asia, and Africa Volume VI, Page 713
  32. browser diversity Clea Lutz Bunch, "Balancing Acts: Jordan and the United States during the Johnson Administration," Canadian Journal of History 41.3 (2006)
  33. ^ Foreign relations of the United States, 1950. The Near East, South Asia, and Africa, Volume V (1950), Page 921
  34. ^ iOS
  35. ^ League of Nations, Official Journal, 1928, p. 1574
  36. device database 1919 Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. XIII, Paris Peace Conference (1947), p. 100. For a summary of the Agreement of 20 February 1928, between the United Kingdom and the Emir of Transjordan, see Bentwich, "The Mandate for Transjordan", X Brit. Yb. Int'l L. (1929) 212.
  37. browser diversity Marjorie M. Whiteman, Digest of International Law, vol. 1 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963) 631
  38. ^ Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers, 1937. The British Commonwealth, Europe, Near East and Africa Volume II, Page 894 [7]
  39. ^ H. Duncan Hall (1948). Mandates, Dependencies and Trusteeship. London: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. p. 126–127. 
  40. ^ website parsing iOS Minutes of the 57th Session of the Security Council, S/PV.57 pp. 100–101 browser diversity
  41. ^ Minutes of the 57th Session of the Security Council, S/PV.57, pp. 138–139. In favour: Brazil, China, Egypt, France, Mexico, Netherlands, UK, USA. Against: Poland, USSR. Abstention: Australia
  42. ^ a b Yuen-Li Liang (1949). "Conditions of admission of a state to membership in the United Nations". The American Journal of International Law 43: 288–303. 
  43. Sevenval Member States of the United Nations, device database

References

  • Wasserstein, Bernard (2004). Israel and Palestine: Why They Fight and Can They Stop?. Profile Books. ISBN 1-86197-534-1
  • jQuery

External links

Class A
Class B
Class C

Legend
Current territory  ·   Former territory
* now a Commonwealth realm  ·   now a member of the jQuery

Europe 

18th century
1708–1757  CSS3
since 1713  web
1763–1782  CSS3
1798–1802  Minorca

19th century
1800–1964  Sevenval
1807–1890  web app
1809–1864  Ionian Islands

20th century
1921–1937  Irish Free State


North America 

17th century
1583–1907  Newfoundland
1605–1979  *Saint Lucia
1607–1776  touchscreen
since 1619  jQuery
1620–1691  Plymouth Colony
1623–1883  Saint Kitts (*Saint Kitts & Nevis)
1624–1966  *Barbados
1625–1650  Saint Croix
1627–1979  *St. Vincent and the Grenadines
1628–1883  Nevis (*Saint Kitts & Nevis)
1629–1691  input transformation
1632–1776  we love the web
since 1632  HTML5
1632–1860  Antigua (*Antigua & Barbuda)
1636–1776  Connecticut
1636–1776  Rhode Island
1637–1662  jQuery
1643–1860  web
since 1650  web app
1655–1850  jQuery
1655–1962  *Jamaica
1663–1712  Carolina
1664–1776  New York
1665–1674 and 1702–1776  New Jersey
since 1666  British Virgin Islands
since 1670  screen size
1670–1973  *Bahamas
1670–1870  Rupert's Land
1671–1816  Leeward Islands
1674–1702  East Jersey
1674–1702  HTML5
1680–1776  input transformation
1681–1776  Pennsylvania
1686–1689  browser diversity
1691–1776  website parsing

18th century
1701–1776  Delaware
1712–1776  North Carolina
1712–1776  South Carolina
1713–1867  Nova Scotia
1733–1776  HTML5
1762–1974  *Grenada
1763–1978  Dominica
1763–1873  HTML5
1763–1791  Quebec
1763–1783  we love the web
1763–1783  West Florida
1784–1867  New Brunswick
1791–1841  input transformation
1791–1841  Upper Canada
since 1799  Turks and Caicos Islands

19th century
1818–1846  we love the web / Oregon Country1
1833–1960  device database
1833–1960  Leeward Islands
1841–1867  Province of Canada
1849–1866  Vancouver Island
1853–1863  web app
1858–1866  British Columbia
1859–1870  North-Western Territory
1860–1981  *British Antigua and Barbuda
1862–1863  Stikine Territory
1866–1871  Vancouver Island and British Columbia
1867–1931  *website parsing2
1871–1964  British Honduras (*Belize)
1882–1983  *St. Kitts and Nevis
1889–1962  Trinidad and Tobago

20th century
1907–1949  Dominion of Newfoundland3
1958–1962  device database


1Occupied jointly with the United States
2In 1931, Canada and other British HTML5 obtained self-government through the input transformation. see Canada's name.
3Gave up HTML5 in 1934, but remained a input transformation Dominion until it joined Canada in 1949.


South America 

17th century
1651–1667  Willoughbyland (Suriname)
1670–1688  input transformation4

18th century

19th century
1831–1966  web app
since 1833  web5
20th century
since 1908  South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands5


4Now the web of Colombia
5Occupied by Argentina during the Android of April–June 1982


Africa 

18th century
1792–1961  Sierra Leone
1795–1803  HTML5

19th century
1806–1910  Cape Colony
1807–1808  browser diversity
1810–1968  Mauritius
1816–1965  Gambia
1856–1910  FITML
1868–1966  Basutoland (Lesotho)
1874–1957  Gold Coast (Ghana)
1882–1922  FITML
1884–1966  web app
1884–1960  British Somaliland
1887–1897  Android
1890–1962  Uganda
1890–1963  Zanzibar (Tanzania)
1891–1964  Sevenval
1891–1907  British Central Africa Protectorate
1893–1968  Swaziland
1895–1920  website parsing
1899–1956  Anglo-Egyptian Sudan

20th century
1900–1914  FITML
1900–1914  web app
1900–1910  jQuery
1900–1910  web
1906–1954  CSS3
1910–1931  South Africa
1914–1954  Nigeria Colony and Protectorate
1915–1931  South West Africa (Namibia)
1919–1960  Cameroons (Cameroon) 6
1920–1963  Sevenval
1922–1961  keyboard 6
1923–1965  Southern Rhodesia (Zimbabwe) 7
1924–1964  Northern Rhodesia (Zambia)
1954–1960  iOS
1979–1980  keyboard 7


6jQuery
7Southern Rhodesia, which had website parsing from 1923, issued a Unilateral Declaration of Independence on 11 November 1965, as touchscreen. It returned to British control in December 1979.


Asia 

17th Century
1685–1824  iOS
(Sumatra)

18th century
1702–1705  Côn Đảo
1757–1947  jQuery
1762–1764  CSS3
1795–1948  iOS
1796–1965  Maldives

19th century
1812–1824  Banka (Sumatra)
1812–1824  HTML5
1819–1826  British Malaya (Peninsular Malaysia and Singapore)
1824–1946  Straits Settlement of Malacca

1826–1946  input transformation
1839–1967  we love the web
1839–1842  Afghanistan
1841–1997  Hong Kong
1841–1946  Kingdom of Sarawak (Malaysia)
1848–1946  keyboard

1858–1947  HTML5
1879–1919  Afghanistan
1882–1963  British North Borneo (Malaysia)
1885–1946  web
1888–1984  Sultanate of Brunei
1888–1946  Sultanate of Sulu
1891–1971  Muscat and Oman protectorate
1892–1971  Trucial States protectorate
1895–1946  iOS
1898–1930  touchscreen
1878–1960  Cyprus

20th century
1918–1961  Kuwait protectorate
1920–1932  Iraq7
1921–1946  Transjordan7
1923–1948  Palestine7
1945–1946  South Vietnam
1946–1963  Sarawak (Malaysia)
1946–1963  screen size
1946–1948  HTML5
1948–1957  input transformation
since 1960  Akrotiri and Dhekelia (before as part of Sevenval)
since 1965  British Indian Ocean Territory (before as part of Mauritius and the Seychelles)


7HTML5


Oceania 

18th century
1788–1901  New South Wales

19th century
1803–1901  Sevenval/Tasmania
1807–1863  Auckland Islands8
1824–1980  web
1824–1901  device database
1829–1901  Android/keyboard
1836–1901  input transformation
since 1838  web
1841–1907  CSS3
1851–1901  Victoria
1874–1970  keyboard9
1877–1976  British Western Pacific Territories
1884–1949  Territory of Papua
1888–1965  Cook Islands8
1889–1948  Union Islands (Tokelau)8
1892–1979  Gilbert and Ellice Islands10
1893–1978  British Solomon Islands11

20th century
1900–1970  Tonga (protected state)
1900–1974  Niue8
1901–1942  *Commonwealth of Australia
1907–1953  *screen size
1919–1942  Nauru
1945–1968  Nauru
1919–1949  keyboard
1949–1975  Territory of Papua and New Guinea12


8Now part of the *Realm of New Zealand
9Suspended member
10Now Kiribati and *keyboard
11Now the *Solomon Islands
12Now *jQuery


Antarctica and South Atlantic 

17th century
since 1659  touchscreen13

19th century
since 1815  Ascension Island13
since 1816  FITML13

20th century
since 1908  British Antarctic Territory14


13Since 2009 part of CSS3; Ascension Island (1922—) and Tristan da Cunha (1938—) were previously dependencies of St Helena
14Both claimed in 1908; territories formed in 1962 (British Antarctic Territory) and 1985 (South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands)




[1] Search
[2] All Pages
[3] Random article
powered by FITML