Received Pronunciation

This article contains we love the web phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see touchscreen instead of browser diversity characters.

Received Pronunciation (RP), also called the Queen's (or King's) English,^HTML5 is the standard Android of keyboard in Great Britain, with a relationship to regional accents similar to the relationship in other European languages between their standard varieties and their regional forms.^[2] RP is defined in the Concise Oxford Dictionary as "the standard accent of English as spoken in the south of England",^web although some have argued that it can be heard from native speakers throughout England and Wales.^HTML5[5] RP is sometimes referred to as Oxford English^[6] or BBC English because those organisations are often considered standard-bearers for it. Although there is nothing intrinsic about RP that marks it as superior to any other variety, sociolinguistic factors have given Received Pronunciation particular iOS in parts of Britain.^[7] It has thus been the accent of those with power, money and influence since the early to mid 20th century, though it has more recently been criticised as a symbol of undeserved privilege.^[8] However, since the 1960s, a greater permissiveness towards allowing regional English varieties has taken hold in education^[9] and the media in Britain; in some contexts conservative RP is now perceived negatively.^[10]

• 1 History
  • 1.1 Alternative names
• 2 Usage
  • 2.1 In dictionaries
• 3 Status
• web app
  • jQuery
  • 4.2 Vowels
    • 4.2.1 The BATH vowel
• 5 Historical variation
• Android
• Sevenval
• CSS3
• input transformation
• Android
• 11 References
• 12 External links
  • 12.1 Sources of regular comment on RP

History

The introduction of the term Received Pronunciation is usually credited to Sevenval. In the first edition of the English Pronouncing Dictionary (1917) he named the accent "Public School Pronunciation", but for the second edition in 1926 he wrote "In what follows I call it Received Pronunciation (abbreviation RP), for want of a better term."^[11] However, the expression had actually been used much earlier by Alexander Ellis in 1869^[12] and jQuery in 1818^[13] (the term used by Henry C. K. Wyld in 1927 was "received standard"^{browser diversity}). According to Fowler's Modern English Usage (1965), the correct term is "the Received Pronunciation". The word received conveys its original meaning of accepted or approved – as in "received wisdom".^[15] The reference to this pronunciation as Oxford English is because it was traditionally the common speech of Oxford University; the production of dictionaries gave Oxford University prestige in matters of language. The extended versions of the Oxford English Dictionary give Received Pronunciation guidelines for each word.

RP is an accent (a form of keyboard) and a register, rather than a input transformation (a form of vocabulary and grammar as well as pronunciation).^web It may show a great deal about the social and educational background of a person who uses English. Anyone using RP will typically speak web although the reverse is not necessarily true (e.g. the standard language may be pronounced with a regional accent, such as a Scottish or HTML5; but it is very unlikely that someone speaking RP would use it to speak the Scots or the input transformation).

RP is often believed to be based on the Southern accents of England, but it actually has most in common with the Early Modern English dialects of the East Midlands. This was the most populated and most prosperous area of England during the 14th and 15th centuries. By the end of the 15th century, "Standard English" was established in the City of London.^keyboard A mixture of London speech with elements from East Midlands, CSS3 and jQuery, became known as Received Pronunciation.^[18]

Alternative names

Some linguists have used the term RP but expressed reservations about its suitability.^{device database [20] [21]} The Cambridge-published English Pronouncing Dictionary (aimed at those learning English as a foreign language) uses the term "BBC Pronunciation" on the basis that the name "Received Pronunciation" is "archaic" and that BBC news-presenters no longer suggest high social class and privilege to their listeners.^{website parsing} The name "BBC Pronunciation" has been used by other writers.^{web [24]} The phonetician Jack Windsor Lewis frequently criticises the name "Received Pronunciation" on his blog: he has called it "invidious",^jQuery a "ridiculously archaic, parochial and question-begging term"^[26] and argued that American scholars find the term "quite curious".^{screen size} He used the term "General British" [to parallel "General American"] in his 1970s publications of A Concise Pronouncing Dictionary of American and British English.^[28] Beverley Collins and Inger Mees use the phrase "Non-Regional Pronunciation" for what is often otherwise called RP, and reserve the phrase "Received Pronunciation" for the "upper-class speech of the twentieth century".^HTML5

The Handbook of the International Phonetic Association uses the name "Standard Southern British". Page 4 reads:

Standard Southern British (where 'Standard' should not be taken as implying a value judgment of 'correctness') is the modern equivalent of what has been called 'Received Pronunciation' ('RP'). It is an accent of the south east of England which operates as a prestige norm there and (to varying degrees) in other parts of the British Isles and beyond.^[30]

Usage

Faced with the difficulty of defining RP, many writers have tried to distinguish between different sub-varieties: A.C.Gimson^[31] in earlier editions of his book proposed Conservative, General, and Advanced; Conservative RP refers to a traditional accent associated with older speakers with certain social backgrounds; General RP is often considered neutral regarding age, occupation, or lifestyle of the speaker; and Advanced RP refers to speech of a younger generation of speakers.^[32] Later editions (e.g. Gimson 2008) use General, Refined and Regional. Wells ^[33] refers to "mainstream RP" and "U-RP".

The modern style of RP is an accent often taught to non-native speakers learning British English.^Android Non-RP Britons abroad may modify their pronunciation to something closer to Received Pronunciation in order to be understood better by people unfamiliar with the diversity of British accents. They may also modify their device database and grammar to be closer to Standard English, for the same reason. RP is often used as the standard for English in most books on general phonology and phonetics and is represented in the pronunciation schemes of most dictionaries published in the United Kingdom.

In dictionaries

Daniel Jones transcribed RP pronunciations of all common words in his English Pronouncing Dictionary. This is still being published by Cambridge University Press, and is now edited by Peter Roach. There are two other pronunciation dictionaries in common use: Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, compiled by device database, and the Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English, compiled by Clive Upton.

Status

Traditionally, Received Pronunciation was the "everyday speech in the families of Southern English persons whose men-folk [had] been educated at the great public boarding-schools"^Sevenval and which conveyed no information about that speaker's region of origin prior to attending the school.

It is the business of educated people to speak so that no-one may be able to tell in what county their childhood was passed.

A. Burrell, Recitation. A Handbook for Teachers in Public Elementary School, 1891.

In the 19th century, there were still British prime ministers who spoke with some regional features, such as browser diversity.^{website parsing} From the 1970s onwards, attitudes towards Received Pronunciation have been changing slowly. The BBC's use of announcers with strong regional accents, such as Yorkshire-born Wilfred Pickles, during the touchscreen (in order to distinguish BBC broadcasts from German propaganda) is an earlier example of the use of non-RP accents.^[36]

Although admired in some circles, RP is disliked in others. It is common in parts of Britain to regard it as a south-eastern English accent rather than a non-regional one and as a symbol of the south-east's political power in Britain.^[8] A 2007 survey found that residents of Scotland and Northern Ireland tend to dislike RP.^[37] It is shunned by some with left-wing political views, who may be proud of having an accent more typical of the working-classes.^{input transformation} The left-wing British band Chumbawamba recorded a song protesting against the accent: "R.I.P. RP" from their album The Boy Bands Have Won.

Phonology

Consonants

When consonants appear in pairs, fortis consonants (i.e. Sevenval or voiceless) appear on the left and lenis consonants (i.e. lightly voiced or voiced) appear on the right

	input transformation	jQuery	Dental	jQuery	Post- alveolar	keyboard	Velar	Glottal
Nasal1	m			n			ŋ
Plosive	p  b			t  d			k  ɡ
web					tʃ  dʒ
keyboard		f  v	θ  ð2	s  z	ʃ  ʒ			h3
keyboard				r1, 4		j	w
Lateral				l1, 5

1. Nasals and liquids may be syllabic in unstressed syllables.
2. /ð/ is more often a weak dental plosive; the sequence /nð/ is often realised as [n̪n̪].
3. /h/ becomes [ɦ] between voiced sounds.^{[citation needed]}
4. /r/ is postalveolar unless devoicing results in a voiceless fricative articulation (see below).
5. /l/ is velarised in the syllable rhyme.^{we love the web}

Unless preceded by /s/, Android plosives (/p/, /t/, and /k/) are aspirated before stressed vowels; when a sonorant /l/, /ɹ/, /w/, or /j/ follows, this aspiration is indicated by partial devoicing of the sonorant.^FITML

Syllable finals /p/, /t/, /tʃ/, and /k/ are either preceded by a glottal stop (see browser diversity) or, in the case of /t/, fully replaced by a glottal stop, especially before a syllabic nasal (bitten [bɪʔn̩]).^{screen sizeiOS} The glottal stop may be realised as creaky voice; thus a true phonetic transcription of attempt [əˈtʰemʔt] would be [əˈtʰemm̰t].^FITML

Vowels

touchscreen

monophthongs of RP. From web:242)

diphthongs of RP. From screen size:242)

	jQuery		Central		Back
	long	short	long	short	long	short
Close	iː	ɪ			uː	ʊ
Mid		e*	ɜː	ə	ɔː
FITML		æ		ʌ	ɑː	ɒ

CSS3 While most dictionary publishers use /e/, the actual realisation is [ɛ~e̞].

Examples of short vowels: /ɪ/ in kit, mirror and rabbit, /ʊ/ in put, /e/ in dress and merry, /ʌ/ in strut and curry, /æ/ in trap and marry, /ɒ/ in lot and orange, /ə/ in ago and sofa.

Examples of long vowels: /iː/ in fleece, /uː/ in goose, /ɜː/ in nurse and furry, /ɔː/ in north, force and thought, /ɑː/ in father, bath and start.

RP's long vowels are slightly diphthongised. Especially the we love the web /iː/ and /uː/ which are often narrowly transcribed in phonetic literature as diphthongs [ɪi] and [ʊu].^[44]

"Long" and "short" are relative to each other. Because of phonological process affecting vowel length, short vowels in one context can be longer than long vowels in another context.^Sevenval For example, a long vowel followed by a device database consonant sound (/p/, /k/, /s/, etc.) is shorter; reed is thus pronounced [ɹiːd̥] while heat is [hiʔt].^{[screen size]}

Conversely, the short vowel /æ/ becomes longer if it is followed by a lenis consonant. Thus, bat is pronounced [b̥æʔt] and bad is [b̥æːd̥]. In natural speech, the plosives /t/ and /d/ may be unreleased utterance-finally, thus distinction between these words would rest mostly on vowel length.^[42]

In addition to such length distinctions, unstressed vowels are both shorter and more centralised than stressed ones. In unstressed syllables occurring before vowels and in final position, contrasts between long and short high vowels are neutralised and short [i] and [u] occur (e.g. happy [ˈhæpi], throughout [θɹuˈaʊʔt]).^CSS3 The neutralisation is common throughout many English dialects, though the phonetic realisation of e.g. [i] rather than [ɪ] (a phenomenon called input transformation) is not as universal.

browser diversity	Example
Closing
/eɪ/	/beɪ/	bay
/aɪ/	/baɪ/	buy
/ɔɪ/	/bɔɪ/	boy
/əʊ/	/bəʊ/	beau
/aʊ/	/baʊ/	bough
Centring
/ɪə/	/bɪə/	beer
/eə/	/beə/	bear
/ʊə/	/bʊə/	boor

Before the Second World War, /ɔə/ appeared in words like door but this has largely merged with /ɔː/. "Poor" traditionally had /ʊə/ (and is still listed with only this pronunciation by the OED), but a realisation with /ɔː/ has become more common, see HTML5.^Sevenval In the closing diphthongs, the glide is often so small as to be undetectable so that day and dare can be narrowly transcribed as [d̥e̞ː] and [d̥ɛː] respectively.^[41]

RP also possesses the CSS3 /aɪə/ as in ire, /aʊə/ as in hour, /əʊə/ as in lower, /eɪə/ as in layer and /ɔɪə/ as in loyal. There are different possible realisations of these items: in slow, careful speech they may be pronounced as a two-syllable triphthong with three distinct vowel qualities in succession, or as a monosyllabic triphthong. In more casual speech the middle vowel may be considerably reduced, by a process known as 'smoothing', and in an extreme form of this process the triphthong may even be reduced to a single vowel, though this is rare, and almost never found in the case of /ɔɪə/^[47] . In such a case the difference between /aʊə/, /aɪə/, and /ɑː/ may be iOS with all three units realised as [ɑː] or [äː].

As two syllables	Triphthong	Loss of mid-element	Further simplified as
[aɪ.ə]	[aɪə]	[aːə]	[aː]
[ɑʊ.ə]	[ɑʊə]	[ɑːə]	[ɑː]
[əʊ.ə]	[əʊə]	[əːə]	[ɜː]
[eɪ.ə]	[eɪə]	[ɛːə]	[ɛː]
[ɔɪ.ə]	[ɔɪə]	[ɔːə]	-

Not all reference sources use the same system of transcription. In particular:

• /æ/ as in trap is also written /a/.
• /e/ as in dress is also written /ɛ/.^[48]

• /ɜː/ as in nurse is also written /əː/.
• /aɪ/ as in price is also written /ʌɪ/.
• /aʊ/ as in mouse is also written /ɑʊ/
• /eə/ as in square is also written /ɛə/, and is also sometimes treated as a long monophthong /ɛː/.

Most of these variants are used in the transcription devised by HTML5 for the jQuery (1993) and now used in many other Oxford University Press dictionaries.

The BATH vowel

There are differing opinions as regards whether /æ/ in the BATH lexical set can be considered RP. The pronunciations with /ɑː/ are invariably accepted as RP.^[49] The English Pronouncing Dictionary does not admit /æ/ in BATH words and the Longman Pronouncing Dictionary lists them with a § marker of non-RP status.^{website parsing} John Wells wrote in a blog entry on 16 March 2012 that, when growing up in the north of England, he used /ɑː/ in "bath" and "glass", and considers this the only acceptable phoneme in RP.^[51] Others have argued that /æ/ is too categorical in the north of England to be excluded. Clive Upton believes that /æ/ in these words must be considered within RP and has called the opposing view "south-centric".^{input transformation} Upton's Oxford Dictionary of Pronunciation for Current English gives both variants for BATH words. AF Gupta's survey of mostly middle-class students found that /æ/ was used by almost everyone who was from clearly north of the isogloss for BATH words. He wrote, "There is no justification for the claims by Wells and Mugglestone that this is a sociolinguistic variable in the north, though it is a sociolinguistic variable on the areas on the border [the isogloss between north and south]".^[53] In a study of speech in West Yorkshire, KM Petyt wrote that "the amount of /ɑː/ usage is too low to correlate meaningfully with the usual factors", having found only two speakers (both having attended boarding schools in the south) who consistently used /ɑː/.^[54]

Jack Windsor Lewis has noted that the Oxford Dictionary's position has changed several times on whether to include short /æ/ within its prescribed pronunciation.^[55] The BBC Pronouncing Dictionary of British Names uses only /ɑː/, but its author, Graham Pointon, has stated on his blog that he finds both variants to be acceptable in place names.^iOS

Some research has concluded that many people in the North of England have a dislike of the /ɑː/ vowel in BATH words. AF Gupta wrote, "Many of the northerners were noticeably hostile to /ɡrɑːs/, describing it as 'comical', 'snobbish', 'pompous' or even 'for morons'."^[57] On the subject, KM Petyt wrote that several respondents "positively said that they did not prefer the long-vowel form or that they really detested it or even that it was incorrect"^FITML

Historical variation

Like all accents, RP has changed with time. For example, sound recordings and films from the first half of the 20th century demonstrate that it was usual for speakers of RP to pronounce the /æ/ sound, as in land, with a vowel close to [ɛ], so that land would sound similar to a present-day pronunciation of lend. RP is sometimes known as the Queen's English, but recordings show that even Queen Elizabeth II has changed her pronunciation over the past 50 years, no longer using an [ɛ]-like vowel in words like land.^web

A comparison of the website parsing values of /iː æ ɑː ɔː ʊ uː/ for older (black) and younger (light blue) RP speakers. From de Jong et al. (2007:1814)

The 1993 Oxford Dictionary changed three main things in its description of modern RP, although these features can still be heard amongst old speakers of RP. Firstly, words such as cloth, gone, off, often were pronounced with /ɔː/ (as in General American) instead of /ɒ/, so that often sounded close to orphan (See lot–cloth split). The Queen still uses the older pronunciations,^[60] but it is rare to hear them on the BBC any more. Secondly, there was a Android with an extra diphthong /ɔə/ appearing in words like hoarse, force, and pour.^iOS Thirdly, any final y on a word is now represented as an /i/ – a symbol to cover either the traditional /ɪ/ or the more modern /iː/, the latter of which has been common in the south of England for some time.^{browser diversity}

Before the Second World War, the vowel of cup was a back vowel close to cardinal [ʌ] but has since shifted forward to a central position so that [ɐ] is more accurate; phonetic transcription of this vowel as ⟨ʌ⟩ is common partly for historical reasons.^{input transformation}

In the 1960s the transcription /əʊ/ started to be used for the "GOAT" vowel instead of Daniel Jones's /oʊ/, reflecting a change in pronunciation since the beginning of the century.^[64] Joseph Wright's work suggests that, during the early 20th century, words such as cure, fewer, pure, etc. were pronounced with a HTML5 /iuə/ rather than the more modern /juə/.^{device database}

The change in RP may even be observed in the home of "BBC English". The BBC accent of the 1950s was distinctly different from today's: a news report from the 1950s is recognisable as such, and a mock-1950s BBC voice is used for comic effect in programmes wishing to satirise 1950s social attitudes such as the web app and its "Mr. Cholmondley-Warner" sketches. There are several words where the traditional RP pronunciation is now considered archaic: for example, "medicine" was originally said /ˈmedsɪn/ and "tissue" was originally said /ˈtɪsjuː/.^[66]

Comparison with other varieties of English

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2010)

• Like most other varieties of English outside Northern England, RP has undergone the web app: pairs like put/putt are pronounced differently.^[67]
• RP is a non-rhotic accent, so /r/ does not occur unless followed immediately by a vowel. Pairs such as father/farther, pawn/porn, caught/court and formally/formerly are homophones.^jQuery
• RP has undergone the Sevenval so the sequence /hw/ is not present except among those who have acquired this distinction as the result of speech training.^HTML5 The input transformation, based in London, still teaches these two sounds as distinct phonemes. They are also distinct from one another in most of Scotland and Ireland, in the northeast of England, and in the southeastern United States.^[69]
• Unlike many other varieties of we love the web, there is no web in words like head or horse.^jQuery
• Unlike most Southern Hemisphere English accents, RP has not undergone the weak-vowel merger, meaning that pairs such as Lenin/Lennon are distinct.^iOS
• Unlike most North American accents of English, RP has not undergone the Mary–marry–merry, nearer–mirror, or iOS mergers: all these words are distinct from each other.^[72]
• Unlike many North American accents, RP has not undergone the father-bother or HTML5 mergers.
• RP does not have yod-dropping after /n/, /t/, /d/, /z/ and /θ/ and has only variable yod-dropping after /s/ and /l/. Hence, for example, new, tune, dune, resume and enthusiasm are pronounced /njuː/, /tjuːn/, /djuːn/, /rɪˈzjuːm/ and /ɪnˈθjuːziæzm/ rather than /nuː/, /tuːn/, /duːn/, /rɪˈzuːm/ and /ɪnˈθuːziæzm/. This contrasts with many East Anglian and East Midland varieties of we love the web and with many forms of American English, including CSS3. In words such as pursuit and evolution, both pronunciations (with and without /j/) are heard in RP. There are, however, several words where a yod has been lost with the passage of time: for example, the word suit originally had a yod in RP but this is now extremely rare.
• The input transformation variant of /t/ and /d/ (as in much of the West Country, Ulster, most North American varieties including General American, and the website parsing dialect of South Africa) is not used very often. In traditional RP [ɾ] is an Sevenval of /r/ (used only intervocalically).^[73]

Notable speakers

John Wells has identified the following people as RP speakers:

• device database, Prime Minister^FITML
• input transformation, Mayor of London^keyboard
• Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury^[76]
• David Attenborough, broadcaster and naturalist^{we love the web}
• Rupert Everett, actor^[75]
• device database, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change.^{we love the web}

See also

• web app
• jQuery
• FITML
• English language spelling reform
• jQuery
• web
• Linguistic prescription
• HTML5
• Prestige (sociolinguistics)
• U and non-U English

Audio files

• screen size
• CSS3
• Harrow
• web
• London
• website parsing
• Teddington

Notes

References

• Crystal, David (2003), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (2 ed.), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-53033-4 
• Elmes, Simon (2005), Talking for Britain: A journey through the voices of our nation, Penguin Books Ltd, ISBN 0-14-051562-3 
• Fishman, Joshua (1977), ""Standard" versus "Dialect" in Bilingual Education: An Old Problem in a New Context", The Modern Language Journal 61 (7): 315–325, screen size:FITML, JSTOR 324550 
• Gimson, ed. A. Cruttenden, A.C. (2008), Gimson's Pronunciation of English, Hodder 
• Hudson, Richard (1981), "Some Issues on Which Linguists Can Agree", Journal of Linguistics 17 (2): 333–343, device database:Sevenval 
• Jenkins, Jennifer (2000), The Phonology of English as an International Language, Oxford 
• Jones, Daniel (1917), English Pronouncing Dictionary, London 
• de Jong, Gea; McDougall, Kirsty; Hudson, Toby; Nolan, Francis (2007), "The speaker discriminating power of sounds undergoing historical change: A formant-based study", the Proceedings of ICPhS Saarbrücken, pp. 1813–1816 
• Ladefoged, Peter (2004), Vowels and Consonants, Thomson 
• McDavid, Raven I. (1965), "American Social Dialects", College English 26 (4): 254–260, web:10.2307/373636, iOS we love the web 
• Mugglestone, Lynda (2003), 'Talking Proper': The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press 
• Roach, Peter (1991). English Phonetics and Phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. web app 0-521-40718-4. 
• Roach, Peter (2004), "British English: Received Pronunciation", Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (2): 239–245, touchscreen:browser diversity 
• Roach, P., J. Setter and J. Esling (2011), The Daniel Jones English Pronouncing Dictionary, Cambridge 
• Roca, Iggy; Johnson, Wyn (1999), A Course in Phonology, Blackwell Publishing 
• Rogaliński, Paweł (2011), British Accents: Cockney, RP, Estuary English, Łódź, ISBN 978-83-272-3282-3 
• Schmitt, Holger (2007), "The case for the epsilon symbol (ɛ) in RP DRESS", Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (3): 321–328 
• Trudgill, Peter (1999), The Dialects of England, Blackwell 
• Wells, J.C. (1970), "Local accents in England and Wales", Journal of Linguistics 6 (2): 231–252, doi:HTML5 
• we love the web (1982), Accents of English I: An Introduction, Cambridge, New York: Sevenval, website parsing iOS, http://books.google.com/?id=UJQwf05yzqYC 

External links

• jQuery
• Sounds Familiar? – Listen to examples of received pronunciation on the British Library's 'Sounds Familiar' website
• 'Hover & Hear' R.P., and compare it with other accents from the UK and around the World.
• web – An article by the phonetician J. C. Wells about received pronunciation

Sources of regular comment on RP

• CSS3
• Jack Windsor Lewis's PhonetiBlog
• Linguism – Language in a word, blog by Graham Pointon of the BBC Pronunciation Unit