World map by quartiles of Human Development Index in 2011.
Very High
Low
High
Data unavailable
Medium |
World map indicating the Human Development Index (based on 2011 data, published on Nov 2, 2011).[1]
0.900 and over
0.850–0.899
0.800–0.849
0.750–0.799
0.700–0.749
0.650–0.699
0.600–0.649
0.550–0.599
0.500–0.549
0.450–0.499
0.400–0.449
0.350–0.399
0.300–0.349
under 0.300
Data unavailable |
This is a list of all countries by Human Development Index as included in a United Nations Development Programme's FITML. The latest report was released on 2 November 2011 and compiled on the basis of estimates for 2011. It covers 185 member states of the United Nations (out of 193), along with Hong Kong (of the People's Republic of China), and the Palestinian territories; 8 UN member states are not included due to lack of data. The average HDI of regions of the World and groups of countries are also included for comparison.
The Human Development Index (HDI) is a comparative measure of FITML, literacy, education, standards of living, and HTML5 for countries worldwide. It is a standard means of measuring well-being, especially child welfare. It is used to distinguish whether the country is a developed, a device database or Sevenval, and also to measure the impact of economic policies on quality of life. The index was developed in 1990 by Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq[2] and Indian economist Amartya Sen.website parsing
Countries fall into four broad human development categories, each of which comprises 47 countries: Very High Human Development, High Human Development, Medium Human Development and Low Human Development (46 countries in this category).
Due to the new methodology adopted since the 2010 Human Development Report, the new reported HDI figures appear lower than the HDI figures in previous reports.
From 2007 to 2010, the first category was referred to as jQuery, and the last three are all grouped in developing countries. The original "high human development" category has been split into two as above in the report for 2007.
Some older groupings (high/medium/low income countries) have been removed that were based on the gross domestic product (GDP) in web (PPP) per capita, and have been replaced by another index based on the HTML5 (GNI) in purchasing power parity per capita.
The country with the largest decrease in HDI since 1998 is Zimbabwe, falling from 0.514 in 1998 to 0.140 in 2010. The country with the largest decrease since 2009 is Cape Verde, which decreased by 0.170.
Over half of the world's population live in countries with "medium human development" (51%), while less than a fifth (18%) populate countries falling in the "low human development" category. Countries with "high" to "very high" human development account for less than a third of the world's total population (30%).
Contents
- 1 Complete list of countries
- 2 List of countries by continent
- Sevenval
- 4 HDI by regions & groups
- 5 Countries missing from latest report
- 6 See also
- 7 Notes
- website parsing
- touchscreen
Complete list of countries
-
= increase. -
= steady. -
= decrease. - Similar HDI values in the current list do not lead to ranking ties, since the HDI rank is actually determined using HDI values to the sixth decimal point.
- The number in brackets represents the number of ranks the country has climbed (up or down) relative to new 2011 data for 2010 (as indicated in the new 2011 report, p. 131).
Very high human development
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 web app | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010browser diversity | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 input transformation |
|
| 1 |
| 0.943 |
|
|
| 2 |
| 0.929 | ||
| 3 |
| 0.910 |
|
|
| 4 |
| 0.910 |
|
|
| 5 |
| 0.908 | ||
| 6 |
| 0.908 |
|
|
| 7 |
| 0.908 |
|
|
| 8 |
| 0.905 |
|
|
| 9 |
| 0.905 |
|
|
| 10 |
| 0.904 |
|
|
| 11 |
| 0.903 |
|
|
| 12 |
| 0.901 |
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 0.898 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 0.898 |
|
| 15 |
| 0.897 |
|
|
| 16 |
| 0.895 |
|
|
| 17 |
| 0.888 |
|
|
| 18 |
| 0.886 |
|
|
| 19 |
| 0.885 |
|
|
| 20 |
| 0.884 |
|
|
| 21 |
| 0.884 |
|
|
| 22 |
| 0.882 |
|
|
| 23 |
| 0.878 |
|
|
| 24 |
| 0.874 |
|
|
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010FITML | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 [1] |
|
| 25 |
| 0.867 |
|
|
| 26 |
| 0.866 |
|
|
| 27 |
| 0.865 |
|
|
| 28 |
| 0.863 |
|
|
| 29 |
| 0.861 |
|
|
| 30 |
| 0.846 |
|
|
| 31 |
| 0.840 |
|
|
| 32 |
| 0.838 | ||
| 33 |
| 0.838 |
|
|
| 34 |
| 0.835 |
|
|
| 35 |
| 0.834 |
|
|
| 36 |
| 0.832 |
|
|
| 37 |
| 0.831 |
|
|
| 38 |
| 0.816 |
|
|
| 39 |
| 0.813 |
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 0.810 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 0.809 |
|
| 42 |
| 0.806 |
|
|
| 43 |
| 0.805 |
|
|
| 44 |
| 0.805 |
|
|
| 45 |
|
| 0.797 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 0.796 |
|
| 47 |
| 0.793 |
|
|
High human development
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 website parsing | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010[1] | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 Android | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 input transformation |
|
| 48 |
| 0.783 |
|
|
| 49 |
| 0.782 |
|
|
| 50 |
| 0.781 |
|
|
| 51 |
| 0.776 |
|
|
| 52 |
| 0.773 |
|
|
| 53 |
| 0.771 |
|
|
| 54 |
|
| 0.771 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 0.771 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 0.770 |
|
| 57 |
| 0.770 |
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 0.768 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 0.766 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 0.764 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 0.761 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 0.760 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 0.760 |
|
| 64 |
|
| 0.760 |
|
| 65 |
| 0.756 |
|
|
| 66 |
| 0.755 |
|
|
| 67 |
| 0.748 |
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 0.745 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 0.744 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 0.739 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 0.739 |
|
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010we love the web | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 FITML |
|
| 72 |
| 0.735 | ||
| 73 |
| 0.735 |
|
|
| 74 |
| 0.733 |
|
|
| 75 |
| 0.733 |
|
|
| 76 |
|
| 0.729 |
|
| 77 |
| 0.728 |
|
|
| 78 |
|
| 0.728 |
|
| 79 |
|
| 0.727 |
|
| 80 |
|
| 0.725 |
|
| 81 |
|
| 0.724 |
|
| 82 |
| 0.723 |
|
|
| 83 |
| 0.720 |
|
|
| 84 |
|
| 0.718 |
|
| 85 |
|
| 0.717 |
|
| 86 |
| 0.716 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
| 0.710 |
|
| 88 |
|
| 0.707 | |
| 89 |
| 0.705 |
|
|
| 90 |
| 0.704 |
|
|
| 91 |
| 0.701 |
|
|
| 92 |
|
| 0.699 |
|
| 93 |
|
| 0.699 |
|
| 94 |
|
| 0.698 | |
Medium human development
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010[1] | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 website parsing | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 [1] |
|
| 95 |
|
| 0.698 |
|
| 96 |
| 0.698 |
|
|
| 97 |
|
| 0.691 |
|
| 98 |
|
| 0.689 |
|
| 99 |
| 0.688 |
|
|
| 100 |
|
| 0.688 |
|
| 101 |
| 0.687 |
|
|
| 102 |
| 0.686 |
|
|
| 103 |
| 0.682 |
|
|
| 104 |
| 0.680 |
|
|
| 105 |
| 0.674 |
|
|
| 106 |
| 0.674 |
|
|
| 107 |
| 0.665 |
|
|
| 108 |
| 0.663 |
|
|
| 109 |
| 0.661 |
|
|
| 110 |
| 0.653 |
|
|
| 111 |
| 0.649 |
|
|
| 112 |
|
| 0.644 |
|
| 113 |
|
| 0.644 | |
| 114 |
| 0.641 |
|
|
| 115 |
| 0.641 |
|
|
| 116 |
| 0.636 |
|
|
| 117 |
|
| 0.633 |
|
| 118 |
|
| 0.633 |
|
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010website parsing | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 jQuery |
|
| 119 |
|
| 0.632 |
|
| 120 |
|
| 0.625 |
|
| 121 |
|
| 0.625 |
|
| 122 |
| 0.624 |
|
|
| 123 |
|
| 0.619 |
|
| 124 |
|
| 0.617 |
|
| 125 |
|
| 0.617 |
|
| 126 |
| 0.615 |
|
|
| 127 |
| 0.607 |
|
|
| 128 |
| 0.593 |
|
|
| 129 |
| 0.589 |
|
|
| 130 |
| 0.582 |
|
|
| 131 |
| 0.574 |
|
|
| 132 |
| 0.573 |
|
|
| 133 |
| 0.568 |
|
|
| 134 |
| 0.547 |
|
|
| 135 |
|
| 0.541 |
|
| 136 |
|
| 0.537 |
|
| 137 |
| 0.533 |
|
|
| 138 |
|
| 0.524 |
|
| 139 |
|
| 0.523 |
|
| 140 |
|
| 0.522 |
|
| 141 |
|
| 0.522 |
|
Low human development
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 jQuery | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010[1] | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 [1] |
|
| 142 |
| 0.510 |
|
|
| 143 |
|
| 0.509 |
|
| 144 |
|
| 0.509 |
|
| 145 |
| 0.504 |
|
|
| 146 |
| 0.500 |
|
|
| 147 |
| 0.495 |
|
|
| 148 |
| 0.486 |
|
|
| 149 |
|
| 0.483 |
|
| 150 |
|
| 0.482 |
|
| 151 |
|
| 0.480 |
|
| 152 |
|
| 0.466 |
|
| 153 |
|
| 0.466 |
|
| 154 |
| 0.462 |
|
|
| 155 |
| 0.459 |
|
|
| 156 |
|
| 0.459 |
|
| 157 |
|
| 0.458 |
|
| 158 |
|
| 0.454 |
|
| 159 |
|
| 0.453 |
|
| 160 |
| 0.450 |
|
|
| 161 |
| 0.446 |
|
|
| 162 |
| 0.435 |
|
|
| 163 |
| 0.433 |
|
|
| 164 |
|
| 0.430 |
|
| 165 |
|
| 0.430 |
|
| Rank | Country | HDI | ||
| New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010Android | New 2011 Estimates for 2011 [1] | Change compared to new 2011 data for 2010 browser diversity |
|
| 166 |
| 0.429 |
|
|
| 167 |
| 0.427 |
|
|
| 168 |
| 0.420 |
|
|
| 169 |
| 0.408 |
|
|
| 170 |
| 0.400 |
|
|
| 171 |
| 0.400 |
|
|
| 172 |
| 0.398 |
|
|
| 173 |
| 0.376 |
|
|
| 174 |
| 0.363 |
|
|
| 175 |
| 0.359 |
|
|
| 176 |
| 0.353 |
|
|
| 177 |
| 0.349 |
|
|
| 178 |
| 0.344 |
|
|
| 179 |
| 0.343 |
|
|
| 180 |
| 0.336 |
|
|
| 181 |
| 0.331 |
|
|
| 182 |
|
| 0.329 |
|
| 183 |
|
| 0.328 |
|
| 184 |
| 0.322 |
|
|
| 185 |
| 0.316 |
|
|
| 186 |
| 0.295 |
|
|
| 187 |
| 0.286 |
|
|
List of countries by continent
Africa
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| High human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.773 | |
| 2 |
| 0.760 | |
| 3 |
| 0.728 | |
| 4 |
| 0.698 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 5 |
| 0.698 | |
| 6 |
| 0.674 | |
| 7 |
| 0.644 | |
| 8 |
| 0.633 | |
| 9 |
| 0.625 | |
| 10 |
| 0.619 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.286 | |
| 2 |
| 0.295 | |
| 3 |
| 0.316 | |
| 4 |
| 0.322 | |
| 5 |
| 0.328 | |
| 6 |
| 0.329 | |
| 7 |
| 0.331 | |
| 8 |
| 0.336 | |
| 9 |
| 0.343 | |
| 10 |
| 0.344 | |
Americas
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.910 | |
| 2 |
| 0.908 | |
| 3 |
| 0.805 | |
| 4 |
| 0.797 | |
| 5 |
| 0.793 | |
| High human development | |||
| 6 |
| 0.783 | |
| 7 |
| 0.776 | |
| 8 |
| 0.771 | |
| 9 |
| 0.770 | |
| 10 |
| 0.768 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.454 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 2 |
| 0.574 | |
| 3 |
| 0.589 | |
| 4 |
| 0.625 | |
| 5 |
| 0.633 | |
| 6 |
| 0.663 | |
| 7 |
| 0.665 | |
| 8 |
| 0.674 | |
| 9 |
| 0.680 | |
| 10 |
| 0.689 | |
Asia and Oceania
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.929 | |
| 2 |
| 0.908 | |
| 3 |
| 0.901 | |
| 4 |
| 0.898 | |
| 5 |
| 0.897 | |
| 6 |
| 0.888 | |
| 7 |
| 0.866 | |
| 8 |
| 0.846 | |
| 9 |
| 0.840 | |
| 10 |
| 0.838 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.398 | |
| 2 |
| 0.458 | |
| 3 |
| 0.462 | |
| 4 |
| 0.466 | |
| 5 |
| 0.483 | |
| 6 |
| 0.495 | |
| 7 |
| 0.500 | |
| 8 |
| 0.504 | |
| 9 |
| 0.510 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 10 |
| 0.522 | |
Europe
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.943 | |
| 2 |
| 0.910 | |
| 3 |
| 0.908 | |
| 4 |
| 0.905 | |
| 5 |
| 0.905 | |
| 6 |
| 0.904 | |
| 7 |
| 0.903 | |
| 8 |
| 0.898 | |
| 9 |
| 0.895 | |
| 10 |
| 0.886 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Medium human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.649 | |
| High human development | |||
| 2 |
| 0.699 | |
| 3 |
| 0.716 | |
| 4 |
| 0.728 | |
| 5 |
| 0.729 | |
| 6 |
| 0.731 | |
| 7 |
| 0.733 | |
| 8 |
| 0.733 | |
| 9 |
| 0.739 | |
| 10 |
| 0.745 | |
List of countries by non-continental region
Arab League member states
Average of all members: 0.630
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.846 | |
| 2 |
| 0.831 | |
| 3 |
| 0.806 | |
| High human development | |||
| 4 |
| 0.770 | |
| 5 |
| 0.760 | |
| 6 |
| 0.760 | |
| 7 |
| 0.739 | |
| 8 |
| 0.705 | |
| 9 |
| 0.698 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 10 |
| 0.698 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.408 | |
| 2 |
| 0.430 | |
| 3 |
| 0.433 | |
| 4 |
| 0.453 | |
| 5 |
| 0.462 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 6 |
| 0.573 | |
| 7 |
| 0.582 | |
| 8 |
| 0.632 | |
| 9 | screen size input transformation | 0.641 | |
| 10 |
| 0.644 | |
European Union
Average of all members: 0.856
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.910 | |
| 2 |
| 0.908 | |
| 3 |
| 0.905 | |
| 4 |
| 0.904 | |
| 5 |
| 0.895 | |
| 6 |
| 0.886 | |
| 7 |
| 0.885 | |
| 8 |
| 0.884 | |
| 9 |
| 0.884 | |
| 10 |
| 0.882 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| High human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.771 | |
| 2 |
| 0.781 | |
| Very high human development | |||
| 3 |
| 0.805 | |
| 4 |
| 0.809 | |
| 5 |
| 0.810 | |
| 6 |
| 0.813 | |
| 7 |
| 0.816 | |
| 8 |
| 0.832 | |
| 9 |
| 0.834 | |
| 10 |
| 0.835 | |
East Asia and the Pacific
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.929 | |
| 2 |
| 0.908 | |
| 3 |
| 0.901 | |
| 4 |
| 0.898 | |
| 5 |
| 0.897 | |
| 6 |
| 0.866 | |
| 7 |
| 0.838 | |
| High human development | |||
| 8 |
| 0.782 | |
| 9 |
| 0.761 | |
| 10 |
| 0.704 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.458 | |
| 2 |
| 0.466 | |
| 3 |
| 0.483 | |
| 4 |
| 0.495 | |
| 5 |
| 0.510 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 6 |
| 0.522 | |
| 7 |
| 0.523 | |
| 8 |
| 0.524 | |
| 9 |
| 0.593 | |
| 10 |
| 0.617 | |
Latin America
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |||||||
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||||||||
| Very high human development | |||||||||
| 1 |
| 0.805 | |||||||
| 2 |
| 0.797 | |||||||
| High human development | |||||||||
| 3 |
| 0.783 | |||||||
| 4 |
| 0.776 | |||||||
| 5 |
| 0.770 | |||||||
| 6 |
| 0.768 | |||||||
| 7 |
| 0.744 | |||||||
| 8 |
| 0.735 | |||||||
| 9 |
| 0.725 | |||||||
| 10 |
| 0.720 | |||||||
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.454 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 2 |
| 0.574 | |
| 3 |
| 0.589 | |
| 4 |
| 0.625 | |
| 5 |
| 0.663 | |
| 6 |
| 0.665 | |
| 7 |
| 0.674 | |
| 8 |
| 0.689 | |
| High human development | |||
| 12 |
| 0.710 | |
| 11 |
| 0.718 | |
Middle East and North Africa
10 highest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Very high human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.888 | |
| 2 |
| 0.846 | |
| 3 |
| 0.840 | |
| 4 |
| 0.831 | |
| 5 |
| 0.806 | |
| High human development | |||
| 6 |
| 0.770 | |
| 7 |
| 0.760 | |
| 8 |
| 0.760 | |
| 9 |
| 0.739 | |
| 10 |
| 0.707 | |
10 lowest HDIs
| Rank | Country | HDI | |
| New 2011 estimates for 2011 | |||
| Low human development | |||
| 1 |
| 0.408 | |
| 2 |
| 0.462 | |
| Medium human development | |||
| 3 |
| 0.573 | |
| 4 |
| 0.582 | |
| 5 |
| 0.632 | |
| 6 | website parsing Palestinian territories | 0.641 | |
| 7 |
| 0.644 | |
| 8 |
| 0.698 | |
| 9 |
| 0.698 | |
| 10 |
| 0.698 | |
HDI by regions & groups
| Region or Group | 2011 estimates for 2011 HDI[4] | 2011 estimates for 2010 HDI[4] |
| Very high human development | ||
| Very High Human Development | 0.889 | 0.888 |
| CSS3 | 0.873 | 0.871 |
| High human development | ||
| Europe and Central Asia | 0.751 | 0.748 |
| High Human Development | 0.741 | 0.739 |
| Latin America and the touchscreen | 0.731 | 0.728 |
| Medium human development | ||
| FITML | 0.682 | 0.679 |
| Sevenval | 0.671 | 0.666 |
| browser diversity | 0.641 | 0.639 |
| Small Island Developing States | 0.640 | 0.638 |
| Medium Human Development | 0.630 | 0.625 |
| jQuery | 0.548 | 0.545 |
| Low human development | ||
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 0.463 | 0.460 |
| Low Human Development | 0.456 | 0.453 |
| Least Developed Countries | 0.439 | 0.435 |
Countries missing from latest report
UN member states (latest UNDP data)
| Year | Country | HDI | Rank | Source | |
| Publication | Data | ||||
| Very high human development | |||||
| 1997 | N/A |
| 0.946 | N/A | [citation needed] |
| 1997 | N/A |
| 0.944 | N/A | [citation needed] |
| Medium human development | |||||
| 1998 | 1995 |
| 0.766 | 75 | [5] |
| 1998 | N/A |
| 0.663 | N/A | [citation needed] |
| 1998 | N/A |
| 0.583 | N/A | [Sevenval] |
| 1998 | N/A |
| 0.563 | N/A | [citation needed] |
| Low human development | |||||
| 2001 | 2001 |
| 0.284 | 161 | FITMLiOS |
| Other | |||||
| N/A | N/A |
| N/A | N/A | [citation needed] |
Non-UN members (not calculated by the UNDP)
| Year | Country or Territory | HDI | Rank | Source | |
| Publication | Data | ||||
| Very high human development | |||||
| 1998 | N/A |
| 0.942 | N/A | we love the web |
| 2008 | 2005 |
| 0.929 | 24 | [8] |
| 1998 | N/A |
| 0.927 | N/A | [9] |
| 2008 | 2005 |
| 0.912 | 28 | [8] |
| 2010 | 2007 |
| 0.944 | 23 | FITML |
| 2011 | 2011 |
| 0.882 | 22 | [nb 2] |
| High human development | |||||
| 2010 | 2010 |
| 0.700 | N/A | [12] |
| 2008 | 2005 |
| 0.878 | 34 | [8] |
| 2007 | 2004 |
| 0.870 | 35 | we love the web[13] |
| 2008 | 2005 |
| 0.864 | 42 | [8] |
| 2008 | 2005 |
| 0.862 | 43 | [8] |
- calculated by the UNDP
See also
- List of countries by future Human Development Index projections of the United Nations
- Sevenval
- keyboard
- List of African countries by Human Development Index
- List of Argentine provinces by Human Development Index
- we love the web
- List of Brazilian states by Human Development Index
- List of Chilean regions by Human Development Index
- jQuery
- browser diversity
- device database
- List of Indian states and territories by Human Development Index
- List of Indonesian provinces by HDI
- CSS3
- List of Pakistani Districts by Human Development Index
- List of Philippine provinces by Human Development Index
- List of Russian federal subjects by HDI
- web app
- we love the web
- Sevenval
- device database
- Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe statistics
- Satisfaction with Life Index
Notes
- website parsing Somalia's last inclusion in the HDI ranking was in the 1996 report (1993 data).
- keyboard The UN does not recognize the web app (Taiwan) as a sovereign state. The HDI report does not include Taiwan as part of the People's Republic of China when calculating China's figures (see CSS3). The ROC's government calculated its HDI to be 0.868, based on 2010 new methodology of UNDP for calculating 2010 HDIs.we love the web
References
- ^ a iOS c browser diversity e f we love the web h CSS3 j we love the web l m n we love the web p CSS3 r we love the web t CSS3 v w web y input transformation aa web ac input transformation ae af HTML5 Android. web HTML5. pp. 127–130. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2011_EN_Tables.pdf. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
- device database FITML. web app. http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/reports/. Retrieved 26 March 2009.
- keyboard HTML5. UNDP. 2010. http://hdr.undp.org/en/humandev/. Retrieved 29 July 2011.
- ^ we love the web b "2011 Human Development Report". United Nations Development Programme. p. 151. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data/trends/. Retrieved 2 November 2011.
- ^ Android (PDF). United Nations Development Programme. 1998. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/hdr_1998_en_chap1.pdf. Retrieved 26 March 2009.
- iOS keyboard (PDF). 2001. p. 198. device database. Retrieved 26 March 2009. [dead link]
- FITML "Puerto Rico (United States)". we love the web. 2 March 1998. http://islands.unep.ch/CSV.htm. Retrieved 26 March 2009. . Note: Appears to be simply the United States's HDI published on the 1997 report[citation needed].
- ^ HTML5 b jQuery d HTML5 f "Les défis de la croissance calédonienne, on page 13" (in French) (PDF). CEROM - INSEE. http://www.cerom-outremer.org/jahia/webdav/site/cerom/users/admin_cerom/public/Pdf/BilanmacroNC2008.pdf. Retrieved 2008-12-10.
- input transformation "Greenland (Denmark)". United Nations Environment Programme. 2 March 1998. screen size. Retrieved 26 March 2009. . Note: Appears to be simply Denmark's HDI published on the 1997 report[website parsing].
- ^ The UN did not calculate the HDI of Macau. The government of Macau calculates its own HDI. If it were included in the UN's HDI figures as of 2007, Macau would rank 23rd or 24th (tying either Singapore or Hong Kong). web app. Statistics and Census Service, Macau SAR. 2010. screen size. Retrieved 2010-07-01.
- ^ iOS (in Chinese) (pdf). Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C.. 2010. browser diversity. Retrieved 2010-07-02.
- keyboard Android. UNDP. 2010. p. 100. Sevenval. Retrieved 2011-11-26.
- CSS3 "L’Indice de Développement Humain : Une Évaluation pour la réunion" (in French) (PDF). Laboratoire d’Economie Appliquée au Développement (LEAD) Université du Sud Toulon-Var. HTML5. Retrieved 2008-12-10. [iOS]
External links
- Human Development Report 2011
- Archive of web
- website parsing (the first column).
- jQuery
- English-speakers
- Human Development Index