Search | Navigation

Corruption Perceptions Index

Overview of the index of perception of corruption, 2010.      9–10      6–6.9      3–3.9
     8–8.9      5–5.9      2–2.9
     7–7.9      4–4.9      1–1.9
     No Information
Political corruption
Concepts

Bribery · touchscreen · FITML  · Economics of corruption
Android · jQuery · iOS · we love the web


Corruption by country

screen size · Albania · Angola · Armenia · Bahrain · Canada · iOS · China
screen size · touchscreen · CSS3 · India · Sevenval · Iran
Ireland · Kenya · Kyrgyzstan · Nigeria · keyboard
 · Papua New Guinea
input transformation · FITML · Russia
South Africa · Ukraine · United States
Venezuela · Zimbabwe



This box:
input transformation
touchscreen
web

Since 1995, Transparency International (TI) publishes the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) annually ranking countries "by their perceived levels of corruption, as determined by expert assessments and opinion surveys."[1] The CPI generally defines corruption as "the misuse of public power for private benefit."[2] As of 2010screen size, the CPI ranks 178 countries "on a scale from 10 (very clean) to 0 (highly corrupt)."HTML5

Contents


Methods

Transparency International commissioned Johann Graf Lambsdorff of the University of Passau to produce the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI).[4] The 2010 CPI draws on 13 different surveys and assessments from 10 independent institutions.iOS The institutions are the touchscreen, the touchscreen, the Bertelsmann Foundation, the Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, web app, International Institute for Management Development, Political and Economic Risk Consultancy, the World Economic Forum, and the Sevenval.[6] The 13 surveys/assessments are either business people opinion surveys or performance assessments from a group of analysts.[2] Early CPIs used public opinion surveys. Countries must be assessed by at least three sources to appear in the CPI.[7]

The CPI measures perception of corruption due to the difficulty of measuring absolute levels of corruption.[8]

Validity

A study published in 2002 found a "very strong significant correlation" between the Corruption Perceptions Index and two other proxies for corruption; Black Market activity and overabundance of regulation. All three metrics also had a highly significant correlation with real gross domestic product per capita (RGDP/Cap). The Corruption Perceptions Index correlation with RGDP/Cap was the strongest.[9]

Limitations

Since the set of sources changes, comparing corruption over time with the CPI is inappropriate.HTML5[Android]

Criticism

The Corruption Perceptions Index has drawn increasing criticism in the decade since its launch, leading to calls for the index to be abandoned.web[11][12] This criticism has been directed at the quality of the Index itself, and the lack of actionable insights created from a simple country ranking.HTML5Sevenval Because corruption is willfully hidden, it is impossible to measure directly; instead proxies for corruption are used. The CPI uses an eclectic mix of third-party surveys to sample public perceptions of corruption through a variety of questions, ranging from "Do you trust the government?" to "Is corruption a big problem in your country?"

The use of third-party survey data is a source of criticism. The data can vary widely in methodology and completeness from country to country. The methodology of the Index itself changes from year to year, thus making even basic better-or-worse comparisons difficult. Media outlets, meanwhile, frequently use the raw numbers as a yardstick for government performance, without clarifying what the numbers mean. A local Transparency International chapter disowned the index results after a change in methodology caused a country's scores to increase—media reported it as an "improvement".web Other critics point out that definitional problems with the term "corruption" makes the tool problematic for social science.

The index mainly provides a snapshot of the views of business people and country analysts. In comparison, the questions in the Eurobarometer surveys 64.3 (2005), 68.2 (2007), 72.2 (2009), and the Flash Eurobarometer 236 (2008) established by the CSS3 for all of the 27 European Union members states ask the perceptions and experiences of the general public. In general, the results show a very large divergence between the perception of living in a corrupt country by the general public and the experiences of corruption in everyday life.

Aside from precision issues, a more fundamental critique is aimed at the uses of the Index. As a source of quantitative data in a field hungry for international datasets, the CPI can take on a life of its own, appearing in cross-country and year-to-year comparisons that the CPI authors themselves admit are not justified by their methodology. The authors state in 2008: "Year-to-year changes in a country's score can either result from a changed perception of a country's performance or from a change in the CPI’s sample and methodology. The only reliable way to compare a country’s score over time is to go back to individual survey sources, each of which can reflect a change in assessment." CSS3

The CPI produces a single score per country, which as noted above, cannot be compared year-to-year. In the late 2000s, the field has moved towards unpackable, action-oriented indices (such as those by the International Budget Partnership or keyboard), which typically measure public policies that relate to corruption, rather than try to assess "corruption" as a whole via proxy measures like perceptions.[13] These alternative measures use original (often locally collected) data and so have the same non-comparability problem as the CPI and are limited in scope to specific policy practices (such as public access to parliamentary budget documents) and so they are only an indicator of visible corruption/policy corruption.

Rankings

Worldwide Corruption Perceptions ranking of countries
published by web app


Rank
1
Country
 New Zealand
Index
9.5
9.3
9.4
9.3
9.4
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.4
Rank
2
Country
 Denmark
Index
9.4
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
Rank
2
Country
 we love the web
Index
9.4
9.2
8.9
9.0
9.4
9.6
9.6
9.7
9.7
9.9
Rank
4
Country
 Sweden
Index
9.3
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.0
Rank
5
Country
 Singapore
Index
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.4
9.4
Rank
6
Country
 Sevenval
Index
9.0
8.6
8.6
7.9
8.7
8.8
8.9
8.8
8.5
8.6
Rank
7
Country
 Netherlands
Index
8.9
8.8
8.9
8.9
9.0
8.7
8.6
8.9
9.0
8.8
Rank
8
Country
 Australia
Index
8.8
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.8
8.6
8.5
Rank
8
Country
 Switzerland
Index
8.8
8.7
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.1
9.1
8.8
8.5
8.4
Rank
10
Country
 Canada
Index
8.7
8.9
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.5
8.4
8.7
9.0
8.9
Rank
11
Country
 device database
Index
8.5
8.5
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.6
8.5
8.7
9.0
8.7
Rank
12
Country
 Hong Kong
Index
8.4
8.4
8.2
8.1
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.0
8.2
7.9
Rank
13
Country
 Iceland
Index
8.3
8.5
8.7
8.9
9.2
9.6
9.7
9.6
9.4
9.2
Rank
14
Country
 Germany
Index
8.0
7.9
8.0
7.9
7.8
8.0
8.2
7.7
7.3
7.4
Rank
14
Country
 Japan
Index
8.0
7.8
7.7
7.3
7.5
7.6
7.3
7.0
7.1
7.1
Rank
16
Country
 Austria
Index
7.8
7.9
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.6
8.7
8.0
7.8
7.8
Rank
16
Country
 keyboard
Index
7.8
7.8
7.4
7.0
6.9
6.7
6.9
 
 
 
Rank
16
Country
 HTML5
Index
7.8
7.6
7.7
7.7
8.4
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.7
8.3
Rank
19
Country
 website parsing
Index
7.5
7.1
7.1
7.3
7.1
7.3
7.4
7.6
7.1
6.6
Rank
19
Country
 keyboard
Index
7.5
8.0
8.0
7.7
7.5
7.4
7.4
7.5
6.9
7.5
Rank
21
Country
 website parsing
Index
7.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
22
Country
 Chile
Index
7.2
7.2
6.7
6.9
7.0
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.5
7.5
Rank
22
Country
 Qatar
Index
7.2
7.7
7.0
6.5
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.6
 
 
Rank
24
Country
 United States
Index
7.1
7.1
7.5
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.6
7.5
7.7
7.6
Rank
25
Country
 browser diversity
Index
7.0
6.8
6.9
6.9
7.3
7.4
7.5
6.9
6.3
6.7
Rank
25
Country
 Saint Lucia
Index
7.0
 
7.0
7.1
6.8
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
25
Country
 web
Index
7.0
6.9
6.7
6.9
6.7
6.4
5.9
5.5
5.1
5.1
Rank
28
Country
 CSS3
Index
6.8
6.3
6.5
5.9
5.7
6.2
6.2
6.1
5.2
 
Rank
29
Country
 web app
Index
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.7
6.4
5.5
5.6
5.6
Rank
30
Country
 Cyprus
Index
6.3
6.3
6.6
6.4
5.3
5.6
5.7
5.4
6.1
 
Rank
31
Country
 HTML5
Index
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.5
6.7
6.8
7.0
6.9
7.1
7.0
Rank
32
Country
 Sevenval
Index
6.1
5.8
5.6
5.8
5.4
5.6
5.9
6.0
5.7
6.4
Rank
32
Country
 Sevenval
Index
6.1
6.0
5.8
6.1
6.5
6.6
6.5
6.6
6.3
6.3
Rank
32
Country
 Republic of China
Index
6.1
5.8
5.6
5.7
5.7
5.9
5.9
5.6
5.7
5.6
Rank
35
Country
 Slovenia
Index
5.9
6.4
6.6
6.7
6.6
6.4
6.1
5.9
6.0
5.2
Rank
36
Country
 web
Index
5.8
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.1
5.9
6.3
6.4
7.0
7.3
Rank
36
Country
 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Index
5.8
 
6.4
6.5
6.1
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
38
Country
 Bhutan
Index
5.7
5.7
5.0
5.4
5.0
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
39
Country
 we love the web
Index
5.6
5.6
5.2
5.8
5.8
6.4
6.4
 
 
 
Rank
39
Country
 Puerto Rico
Index
5.6
5.8
5.8
5.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
41
Country
 Cape Verde
Index
5.5
5.1
5.1
5.1
4.9
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
41
Country
 HTML5
Index
5.5
5.3
5.0
4.6
4.2
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.0
Rank
43
Country
 input transformation
Index
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.1
5.1
5.0
4.5
4.3
4.5
Rank
44
Country
 Brunei
Index
5.2
5.5
5.5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
44
Country
 Dominica
Index
5.2
5.2
5.9
6.0
5.6
4.5
3.0
2.9
3.3
3.2
Rank
46
Country
 keyboard
Index
5.2
4.9
5.1
5.4
5.0
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.1
 
Rank
46
Country
 Macau
Index
5.2
5.0
5.3
5.4
5.7
6.6
 
 
 
 
Rank
46
Country
 Mauritius
Index
5.2
5.4
5.4
5.5
4.7
5.1
4.2
4.1
4.4
4.5
Rank
49
Country
 Rwanda
Index
5.0
4.0
3.3
3.0
2.8
2.5
3.1
 
 
 
Rank
50
Country
 Costa Rica
Index
4.8
5.3
5.3
5.1
5.0
4.1
4.2
4.9
4.3
4.5
Rank
50
Country
 web
Index
4.8
5.0
4.9
4.6
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.6
4.7
4.8
Rank
50
Country
 jQuery
Index
4.8
5.3
5.5
5.5
4.7
5.4
6.3
6.1
6.3
 
Rank
50
Country
 Sevenval
Index
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.5
3.6
4.0
4.4
 
 
Rank
54
Country
 screen size
Index
4.6
4.7
5.1
5.1
5.3
5.2
5.0
4.8
4.8
4.9
Rank
54
Country
 we love the web
Index
4.6
4.5
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.8
4.7
4.6
5.3
 
Rank
56
Country
 web
Index
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.1
4.7
5.3
5.7
5.3
4.6
4.5
Rank
57
Country
 Czech Republic
Index
4.4
4.6
4.9
5.2
5.2
4.8
4.3
4.2
3.9
3.7
Rank
57
Country
 Namibia
Index
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.1
4.3
4.1
4.7
5.7
Rank
57
Country
 Saudi Arabia
Index
4.7
4.7
4.3
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.4
3.4
4.5
 
Rank
60
Country
 Malaysia
Index
4.3
4.4
4.5
5.1
5.1
5.0
5.1
5.0
5.2
4.9
Rank
61
Country
 device database
Index
4.2
3.7
4.4
4.3
4.2
3.5
3.8
3.7
4.6
 
Rank
61
Country
 Latvia
Index
4.2
4.3
4.5
5.0
4.8
4.7
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.7
Rank
61
Country
 Turkey
Index
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.6
4.1
3.8
3.5
3.2
3.1
3.2
Rank
64
Country
 iOS
Index
4.1
3.8
4.1
3.9
3.4
2.8
2.3
2.0
1.8
2.4
Rank
64
Country
 input transformation
Index
4.1
4.5
4.7
4.9
5.1
4.6
4.5
4.6
4.4
4.8
Rank
66
Country
 website parsing
Index
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.4
4.1
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.8
Rank
66
Country
 Montenegro
Index
4.0
3.7
3.9
3.4
3.3
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
66
Country
 keyboard
Index
4.0
4.3
4.5
5.0
4.9
4.7
4.3
4.0
3.7
3.7
Rank
69
Country
 Ghana
Index
3.9
4.1
3.9
3.9
3.7
3.3
3.5
3.6
3.3
3.9
Rank
69
Country
 Italy
Index
3.9
3.9
4.3
4.8
5.2
6.2
6.2
5.2
 
 
Rank
69
Country
 Macedonia
Index
3.9
4.1
3.8
3.6
3.3
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.3
 
Rank
69
Country
 Samoa
Index
3.9
4.1
4.5
4.4
4.5
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
73
Country
 Brazil
Index
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.7
3.9
3.9
4.0
Rank
73
Country
 Tunisia
Index
3.8
4.3
4.2
4.4
4.2
4.6
4.9
5.0
4.9
4.8
Rank
75
Country
 web app
Index
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.5
Rank
75
Country
 device database
Index
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.6
Rank
77
Country
 HTML5
Index
3.5
3.2
2.9
1.9
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.5
 
Rank
77
Country
 browser diversity
Index
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.4
 
 
 
Rank
77
Country
 Vanuatu
Index
3.5
3.6
3.2
2.9
3.1
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
80
Country
 we love the web
Index
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
3.8
3.7
3.6
Rank
80
Country
 Sevenval
Index
3.4
3.6
3.4
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.2
3.7
3.4
3.2
Rank
80
Country
 web app
Index
3.4
3.5
3.8
4.7
4.6
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
Rank
80
Country
 CSS3
Index
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.7
Rank
80
Country
 Peru
Index
3.4
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.4
Rank
80
Country
 Thailand
Index
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.6
3.8
3.6
3.3
3.2
Rank
–
Country
 Grenada
Index
 
 
 
3.4
3.5
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
86
Country
 Bulgaria
Index
3.3
3.6
3.8
3.6
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.1
3.9
4.0
Rank
86
Country
 web app
Index
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.7
3.6
3.3
3.8
4.0
Rank
86
Country
 CSS3
Index
3.3
3.6
3.4
3.4
3.2
3.1
3.5
3.7
3.4
3.0
Rank
86
Country
 Sevenvalweb app
Index
3.3
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.0
2.8
2.7
2.3
 
 
Rank
86
Country
 website parsing
Index
3.3
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.2
3.5
3.4
3.7
Rank
91
Country
 Bosnia and Herzegovina
Index
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
2.9
2.9
3.1
3.3
 
 
Rank
91
Country
 Liberia
Index
3.2
3.3
3.1
2.4
2.1
 
2.2
 
 
 
Rank
91
Country
 keyboard
Index
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.8
4.2
4.6
4.9
Rank
91
Country
 jQuery
Index
3.2
3.0
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.6
Rank
95
Country
 Albania
Index
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.4
2.9
2.6
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.5
Rank
95
Country
 we love the web
Index
3.1
3.3
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.3
2.9
2.8
2.8
2.7
Rank
95
Country
 Sevenval
Index
3.1
3.2
2.8
3.1
3.3
3.7
 
 
 
 
Rank
95
Country
 Swaziland
Index
3.1
3.2
3.6
3.6
3.3
2.5
2.7
 
 
 
Rank
95
Country
 Tonga
Index
3.1
3.0
3.0
2.4
1.7
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 FITML
Index
3.0
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.5
2.8
Rank
100
Country
 web
Index
3.0
2.8
2.9
3.1
2.7
2.5
2.9
3.2
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 touchscreen
Index
3.0
3.1
3.6
3.5
2.9
3.2
3.4
 
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 Djibouti
Index
3.0
3.2
3.0
2.9
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 iOS
Index
3.0
2.8
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.0
2.9
3.3
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 device database
Index
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.9
Rank
100
Country
 HTML5
Index
3.0
2.6
3.4
3.2
3.1
2.8
3.1
2.6
1.7
 
Rank
100
Country
 browser diversity
Index
3.0
3.4
3.3
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
Rank
100
Country
 Mexico
Index
3.0
3.1
3.3
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.6
Rank
100
Country
 São Tomé and Príncipe
Index
3.0
3.0
2.8
2.7
2.7
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 Suriname
Index
3.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
100
Country
 Tanzania
Index
3.0
2.7
3.0
3.2
2.9
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.7
 
Rank
112
Country
 website parsing
Index
2.9
2.9
2.8
3.2
3.0
3.1
2.8
2.7
2.6
 
Rank
112
Country
 FITML
Index
2.9
3.1
2.8
2.8
2.9
3.3
3.4
3.2
3.3
3.4
Rank
112
Country
 Kosovo
Index
2.9
2.8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
112
Country
 Moldova
Index
2.9
2.9
3.3
2.9
2.8
3.2
2.9
2.3
2.4
2.1
Rank
112
Country
 Senegal
Index
2.9
2.9
3.0
3.4
3.6
3.3
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.1
Rank
112
Country
 Vietnam
Index
2.9
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.4
2.4
 
Rank
–
Country
 Belize
Index
 
 
2.9
3.0
3.5
3.7
3.8
4.5
 
 
Rank
118
Country
 browser diversity
Index
2.8
2.8
2.7
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.5
2.2
2.3
2.2
Rank
118
Country
 Mali
Index
2.8
2.7
3.1
2.7
2.8
2.9
3.2
3.0
 
 
Rank
120
Country
 Bangladesh
Index
2.7
2.4
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.2
 
Rank
120
Country
 Ecuador
Index
2.7
2.5
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.4
2.2
2.2
 
Rank
120
Country
 Ethiopia
Index
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.4
2.2
2.3
2.5
3.5
 
Rank
120
Country
 Guatemala
Index
2.7
3.2
3.4
3.1
2.8
2.6
2.5
2.2
2.4
2.5
Rank
120
Country
 Iran
Index
2.7
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.7
2.9
2.9
3.0
 
 
Rank
120
Country
 Kazakhstan
Index
2.7
2.9
2.7
2.2
2.1
2.6
2.6
2.2
2.4
2.3
Rank
120
Country
 Mongolia
Index
2.7
2.7
3.0
3.0
2.8
3.0
3.0
 
 
 
Rank
120
Country
 Mozambique
Index
2.7
2.7
2.6
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.7
 
 
Rank
120
Country
 device database
Index
2.7
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.8
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
129
Country
 CSS3
Index
2.6
2.6
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.9
3.1
3.0
 
 
Rank
129
Country
 Dominican Republic
Index
2.6
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
2.8
3.0
2.9
3.3
3.5
Rank
129
Country
 Honduras
Index
2.6
2.4
2.6
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.7
 
Rank
129
Country
 Philippines
Index
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.5
2.6
 
Rank
129
Country
 Syria
Index
2.6
2.5
2.1
2.4
2.9
3.4
3.4
3.4
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 Cameroon
Index
2.5
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
1.8
2.2
 
Rank
134
Country
 Eritrea
Index
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.8
2.9
2.6
2.6
 
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 Guyana
Index
2.5
2.7
2.6
2.6
2.5
2.5
 
 
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 web
Index
2.5
2.5
3.0
3.0
3.6
3.1
2.7
3.0
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 Maldives
Index
2.5
2.3
2.8
3.3
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 jQuery
Index
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.7
2.6
2.5
 
Rank
134
Country
 iOS
Index
2.5
2.6
2.8
2.6
2.3
2.4
2.2
 
 
 
Rank
134
Country
 device database
Index
2.5
2.3
2.5
2.4
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.5
2.6
 
Rank
134
Country
 HTML5
Index
2.5
2.4
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.4
2.3
2.2
 
 
Rank
143
Country
 Azerbaijan
Index
2.4
2.4
1.9
2.1
2.4
2.2
1.9
1.8
2.0
 
Rank
143
Country
 Belarus
Index
2.4
2.5
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.6
3.3
4.2
4.8
 
Rank
143
Country
 Comoros
Index
2.4
2.1
2.5
2.6
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
143
Country
 Sevenval
Index
2.4
2.3
2.8
2.6
3.1
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
143
Country
 Nigeria
Index
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.2
2.2
1.9
1.6
1.4
1.6
 
Rank
143
Country
 Russia
Index
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.5
2.4
2.8
2.7
2.7
 
Rank
143
Country
 Timor-Leste
Index
2.4
2.5
2.2
2.6
2.6
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
143
Country
 web
Index
2.4
2.4
2.7
2.3
2.4
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
143
Country
 Uganda
Index
2.4
2.5
2.6
2.8
2.7
2.5
2.6
2.2
2.1
 
Rank
152
Country
 Tajikistan
Index
2.3
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.8
 
 
Rank
152
Country
 iOS
Index
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.7
2.8
2.6
2.2
2.3
2.4
 
Rank
154
Country
 device database
Index
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.4
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 CSS3
Index
2.2
2.1
1.9
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.2
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 Côte d'Ivoire
Index
2.2
2.2
2.0
2.1
 
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.7
 
Rank
154
Country
 web
Index
2.2
2.1
1.9
2.2
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 keyboard
Index
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.9
 
Rank
154
Country
 Laos
Index
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
2.6
3.3
 
 
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 web app
Index
2.2
2.2
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.8
 
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 Papua New Guinea
Index
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.4
2.3
2.6
2.1
 
 
Rank
154
Country
 screen size
Index
2.2
2.2
2.4
2.4
2.6
2.1
1.9
1.6
1.7
 
Rank
154
Country
 Zimbabwe
Index
2.2
2.4
1.8
2.1
2.4
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.7
 
Rank
164
Country
 web app
Index
2.1
2.1
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.3
1.5
1.3
1.2
 
Rank
164
Country
 Guinea
Index
2.1
2.0
1.6
1.9
1.9
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
164
Country
 screen size
Index
2.1
2.0
1.8
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.1
 
 
Rank
164
Country
 Yemen
Index
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.4
2.6
2.4
 
Rank
168
Country
 web app
Index
2.0
1.9
2.2
1.9
2.2
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.7
 
Rank
168
Country
 Chad
Index
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.8
2.0
1.7
1.7
 
 
 
Rank
168
Country
 Democratic Republic of the Congo
Index
2.0
2.0
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.0
 
 
 
Rank
168
Country
 jQuery
Index
2.0
2.2
2.6
2.5
2.7
2.5
2.5
2.1
 
 
Rank
172
Country
 Burundi
Index
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.5
2.4
2.3
 
 
 
 
Rank
172
Country
 HTML5
Index
1.9
1.9
1.7
1.9
2.1
1.9
 
 
 
 
Rank
172
Country
 Venezuela
Index
1.9
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
 
Rank
175
Country
 jQuery
Index
1.8
2.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.5
1.5
2.2
 
Rank
175
Country
 Iraq
Index
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.5
1.9
2.2
2.1
2.2
 
 
Rank
177
Country
 Sudan
Index
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
 
 
Rank
177
Country
 Turkmenistan
Index
1.6
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
1.8
2.0
 
 
 
Rank
177
Country
 web
Index
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.7
2.7
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.9
 
Rank
180
Country
 touchscreen
Index
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.8
 
2.5
 
 
 
 
Rank
180
Country
 Myanmar
Index
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.4
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
 
 
Rank
182
Country
 Sevenval
Index
1.0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rank
182
Country
 Somalia
Index
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.4
 
2.1
 
 
 
 

References

  1. keyboard Transparency International (2011). input transformation. Transparency International. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi. Retrieved 1 December 2011. 
  2. ^ keyboard iOS CPI 2010: Long methodological brief, p. 2
  3. ^ Transparency International (2010). "Corruption Perceptions Index 2010: In detail". Transparency International. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/in_detail. Retrieved 24 August 2011. 
  4. ^ we love the web. HTML5. Retrieved 2005-11-22. 
  5. ^ CPI 2010: Long methodological brief, p. 1
  6. screen size Transparency International (2010). website parsing (Report). Transparency International. touchscreen. Retrieved 24 Aug 2011. 
  7. Android CPI 2010: Long methodological brief, p. 7
  8. ^ a keyboard website parsing (2010). "Frequently asked questions (FAQs)". Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. Transparency International. FITML. Retrieved 24 August 2011. 
  9. web Wilhelm, Paul G. (2002). "International Validation of the Corruption Perceptions Index: Implications for Business Ethics and Entrepreneurship Education". Journal of Business Ethics (Springer Netherlands) 35 (3): 177–89. Sevenval:website parsing. 
  10. ^ Galtung, Fredrik (2006). "Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices," in Measuring Corruption, Charles Sampford, Arthur Shacklock, Carmel Connors, and Fredrik Galtung, Eds. (Ashgate): 101-130. The author, a former Transparency International researcher and pioneer in the development of the Bribe Payers Index (BPI), addresses several criticisms of the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). He argues that the CPI should be radically revised and complemented by additional indicators.
  11. ^ Sik, Endre (2002). "The Bad, the Worse and the Worst: Guesstimating the Level of Corruption," in Political Corruption in Transition: A Skeptic's Handbook, Stephen Kotkin and Andras Sajo, Eds. (Budapest: Central European University Press): 91-113.
  12. Sevenval web app. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/document/25/0,2340,en_2649_33935_37081881_1_1_1_1,00.html. 
  13. ^ a b "Bangladesh's economists question corruption perception index". The HINDU News Update Service. 2007-09-27. FITML. Retrieved 2007-09-28. 
  14. ^ jQuery. Global Integrity. http://commons.globalintegrity.org/2009/02/hey-experts-stop-abusing-corruption.html. 
  15. HTML5 "TI's Index: Local Chapter Not Having It". Global Integrity. browser diversity. 
  16. Sevenval "CPI: Methodology FAQ". Transparency International. screen size. 
  17. web "CPI 2011 table". Transparency Internation. http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2011/results. Retrieved 2011-12-05. 
  18. ^ CSS3. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2010/results. Retrieved 2010-10-26. 
  19. screen size CSS3. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009/cpi_2009_table. Retrieved 2009-11-18. 
  20. screen size CSS3. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2008/cpi2008/cpi_2008_table. Retrieved 2008-12-17. 
  21. screen size CSS3. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/news_room/in_focus/2007/cpi_2007/cpi_2007_table. Retrieved 2007-10-01. 
  22. ^ CSS3. Transparency International. jQuery. Retrieved 2006-11-17. 
  23. ^ "CPI 2005 table". Transparency International. jQuery. Retrieved 2007-12-03. 
  24. keyboard HTML5. Transparency International. http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2004. Retrieved 2007-12-03. 
  25. ^ The years 2002–2005 show data for Serbia and Montenegro
  • Transparency International (2010). jQuery (Report). Transparency International. HTML5. Retrieved 24 Aug 2011. 

External links


HTML5 by political rankings
Freedom
Corruption
Competitiveness
History
Rights
Other

Corruption
Corruption in different fields
Political corruption · input transformation · Corporate corruption · device database
Index
Corruption Perceptions Index
Institutions dealing with political corruption
Transparency International · Sevenval · Group of States Against Corruption · screen size  · Commission for the Prevention of Corruption of the Republic of Slovenia
Anti-corruption laws and enforcement
we love the web · HTML5 · Integrity and Prevention of Corruption Act
International anti-corruption instruments and efforts
jQuery · FITML
Forms or aspects of corruption
Baksheesh · Crony capitalism · FITML · Honest services fraud · web · device database · Systemic corruption
Other
Collusion · web app · keyboard · Kickbacks · Bribery · HTML5 · Sevenval


[1] Search
[2] All Pages
[3] Random article
powered by FITML